News
Barak under fire over Iran comment
Moran Azulay
Published: 17.11.11, 13:24
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
61 Talkbacks for this article
31. I think he took the sting out of their stinger.
nibor ,   israel   (11.17.11)
It seems Iran is all about provocation towards Israel. Maybe the best defense is to take the air out of their sails.
32. Time to throw in the towel Ehud.......
Mike Carmel ,   Rishon le Zion   (11.17.11)
Enough is enough. You are becoming an embarrassment on TV abroad especially with your lispish English. You have tons of money - just go home and enjoy it and shut the hell up already!
33. Barak, was only mocking Iran
Amos ,   africa   (11.17.11)
34. it is our problem, if we don't want to understand him
Yael Schlichting ,   Raubling - Germany   (11.17.11)
Barak wanted to make clear, what the motifs of the Iranian leadership are. The Iranian Leadership want's to become a hegemonic power! Barak understood this and verbally put himself in the position of the Iranian leadership. Where's the problem?
35. Be Done with him...
Jennie ,   Israel/US   (11.17.11)
Barak's behaviour and attitude goes much further, then justifying Iran's potential nuclear capability.. What is mind boggling is, that this obvious hater of his People, is still a minister, in charge of the security on a Nation, he keeps betraying. For decades Barak has shown, that the secuirty of Israeli people are not in his best interest. His retaliatory actions were consitently achieved half way...Israeli citizens, especially children in the South can thank him for daily kassams, for growing and spending much of their time in bunkers..To this day for 40 yeard now... The WB citizens of Israel, who having our backs on lands we own in Yehuda and Shomron, are not being protected approprietly. They too, can thank Barak for savage terror acts and for government's abandonment.... It is a Shame on the whole Government of Israel for not firing Barak long time ago from every position of power and on all state's decisions, especially security....
36. # 28
Birdi ,   Israel   (11.17.11)
Dont doubt it, she sure has intellect & is very clever aswell. Now go eat your heart out
37. Fire him!
Shalom ,   U.S.A.   (11.17.11)
Don't waste your time commenting on him, he is a worthless being and shame on Netanyahu for keeping him in his cabinet!
38. barak....
les ,   canada   (11.17.11)
how very sad to see a great soldier, a heroic fighter, to turn in to an incompetent, useless, common sense challenged "politician". it seems that for bb his pesonal loyalty (admirable in it self) means more than the interest of the nation. that must change!
39. Barak is ok, but his skills in ENGLISH are to blame.
nice ,   tlv   (11.17.11)
the STOM is obviously caused by his spoken english.
40. THis is calculated de-esculation by Israel, will never strik
shneerhere ,   Chicago   (11.17.11)
They've decided to not strike Iran. Therefore, they have to pave public opinion with new ideologies 'understanding' our enemies, as liberals always do. OR... it's clever disinformation before the blitzkrieg, take your pick
41. To Sarah B
RONY ,   USA   (11.17.11)
Last week you threat Iran with "Mashroom Cloud". I am just responding to your remark from one of your leaders. Sorry if u don't get it. With this attitude you might not be healthy under Mashroom clouds.
42. Nr 41. What kind of Jerk is this -
Arn. ,   Sweden.   (11.17.11)
There is not going to be any Mushrom cloud anywhere else than in Iran if any. What has any Israeli leaders remark with the signature Sarah to do ? Seems this signature Nr 41 is not wery healthy under eventual Mushroom Clouds in Iran Amazing what kind of people there are, some are so dumd that they dont understand they are. Arn-Sweden.
43. Bibi HAS to keep Barak. He is Obama's lap dog. The other one
Harry Wright ,   UK   (11.17.11)
is Livni.
44. If Iran would threat
Valdi   (11.17.11)
Yes, Barak is actually right, but he forgot to mention, that if Iran would be a responsible and reliable member of the world community, and wouldn't support terrorists, the world could have lived easier with it being nuclear. On the other side, the West, and especially USA has to understand, that it's claim to want to be the only superpower, which can dictate it's will to others and use force as it did in the past, is contrebuting to the resistance. Russia, i.e., does not want to let Iran become nuclear, but is facing encirclement by NATO, and does not want yet another US miliotary base there. Best.
45. Ehud the poor stupid man
Alexander ,   Tel Aviv, Israel   (11.17.11)
"There once was a man called Ehud. He quickly changed his name to Mahmoud. He claimed he was Israeli. In reality - he was smelly. He claimed himself to be an Israeli Minister of Defense. In reality, he is a Smelly Minister of Pretense." Now - the 1 million dollar question: Am I being sarcastic?
46. It was a fair question
Arnold ,   Canada   (11.17.11)
and Barak handled it. If he would have said "no" to the question that would have been an outright lie.
47. To #41, 36, 28, and famous Sarah
RONY ,   USA   (11.17.11)
This comment is just because last week Sarah B wanted Israel to attack Iran, and if Iran or Hesbollah dare respond she wanted Israel to "Mashroom Cloud" them. Today Barak says that if he were Iran he wants Nukes. No one wants Iran to have Nukes, but the best way to do that is to remove NUKES from Israel. You can argue all you want, but there are no justification o use Nukes like US did, or threat using ones like Sarah or Israel do.
48. #47 RONY, Israel will never be first to use nukes.
Michael ,   California, USA   (11.17.11)
Israel declared and I believe this is a very true statement. Nukes will destroy Israel not less than its enemies because no nuclear weapons can be used locally. Also, blowing up a nuclear plant cannot be localized. Israel resides in the region along with its enemies and will be involved in anything that will harm the region. Anyone thinking of using nukes or bombing an operating nuclear reactor in his/her region is suicidal. To the contrary, Israelis want to live and thrive at home.
49. Nr 41. - and 48
Arn. ,   Sweden.   (11.17.11)
Seems as Nr 12 did an underestimation refgarding intellekt. Nr 41 suggests as a principle that if the allied powers in W.W.2. had disarmed, Germany had done the same. I Quote - No one wants Iran to have Nukes, but the best way to do that is to remove NUKES from Israel. Comment - Nr 41 suggests that he has the insight of a Prophet, as regard to Irans Intention. So how to disarm the Jews in the Holocoast ? Can people realy be so stupid ? Further - You can argue all you want, but there are no justification o use Nukes like US did Comment - So better to sacrifice 500.000 Us Soldiers to defeat Japan, and forced to kill Millions of Japaneese in that Task, then the coupple of 100.000 Japanese to end the War, This Nr 41 is not even Aftersmart or understanding, not even with known History to His disposal. Only a Total Peacejerk blinded by ideological Prejudgements can have such Wievs as this one. It is almost unbelievable what kind of opinion this 41 exhibits. Nr 48. You know nothing about that !. Arn.Sweden.
50. to 47
Jennie ,   Israel/Us   (11.17.11)
You missed the point of most of the posters, you intended your message to...Israel may have nukes for some decades, but the world has never felt threattened by this fact and never should be...The only ones need to be affraid are the enemies of Democracy, tolerance and world peace... I hope you are not delusional enough to compaire Israel to Iran, Rony...
51. RONY # 47
Eaglebeak ,   Left Coast, USA   (11.17.11)
If Israel got rid of her nukes it would not bring peace. It would bring destruction. There was plenty of justification for the United States of America to use nukes in WW2. It ended the war and savaed lives.
52. all the comments
ron rames ,   north brunswick, usa   (11.18.11)
Where do these people get the time to send all these comments! I barely have time to read my emails,pay my bills, go to& from work,eat shower etc. What idle minds must do!!! O gvalt!!!
53. Really dumb even by Barak's pathetically low standards.
Chaim ,   Israel   (11.18.11)
Let's get this straight. Israel is trying to line up as many nations as possible to sanction Iran - and build up justification to destroy Iran's nukes. So what does our genius Defense Minister do? He says if he was Iran, he'd build nukes too! Idiocy even by Barak's lower than a snake's belly standards. Why do we allow such creatures to rise to political power in Israel?
54. To Rony - separate between democracy and dictatorship
Alexander ,   Tel Aviv, Israel   (11.18.11)
Israel is a democracy. Iran is a dictatorship. Israel, USA, UK , India and France are western democracies armed with nukes. Do these nations pose a threat to anyone? Have they threatened to wipe out an entire race of people and spread death and destruction and dictatorship to any country? The answer is a most resounding no. Russia, China, Pakistan and North Korea are dictatorships armed with nukes. With the exception for China, Russia, Pakistan and North Korea do pose a threat to the world population since they have indicated on many occassions their willingness to threaten other nations with nukes. North Korea and Pakistan spread nuclear technology to Moslem terrorists. North Korea has threatened to destroy South Korea. North Korea has even threatened Japan and the USA. The only reason why these nations haven't used any nukes is because countries like Israel, USA, UK, France and India constitute a counterforce to reckon with. Iran doesn't seek nukes because Israel has them. If that's the "argument" you are using, why did the Moslems of the Middle East kill and slaughter Jews for 1400 years and attack Israel before Israel acquired nukes? If nukes irritates Iran, why doesn't Iran threaten to destroy all nuclear powers? Instead Iran picks on Israel. Iran has stated on numerous occasions that it wants to destroy Israel since Iran believes Israel "has no right to exist" (as if we care what they think). It is obvious that Iran's problem is not Israeli nukes but the existence of Israel. Israeli nukes prevents Iran from destroying Israel. Iranian nukes would be a catastrophe to Israel, USA, Europe and the world. So the answer Ron is simple: Either Iran will give up their nuclear program or we will shut down their nuclear program and the entire Iranian nation - permanently. Iranians need to make a painful choice: Do Iranians want to live and accept Israel and other nations of the Middle East and extend a hand of peace and acceptance to everyone, or will Iran go down the path of hate and destruction? If Iran chooses the 2nd alternative, Iran will pay dearly to Israel and the USA. And quite honestly Ron: I'm getting really tired of people questioning Israel's right to having nukes. Our nukes are our guarantee for our survival - we hope we will never use them.
55. #54 - Do u guys belive what u SAY
RONY ,   USA   (11.18.11)
So if Pakestan and India went to war. It's O.K. for India to use Nukes because they are "Democtratic" to end war and save lifes?! But NOT for pakestan! No wonder Israel refuse (OR AT LEAST) want peace on their terms, i,e., 1) Want to give palestinians country with no borders. 2) Does Not want to divide Jerusalem. 3) They ahve to control all resources. 4) They have to control airspace and borders. 5) THEY BUILD setlments on land what they claim they are going to withdraw from. BECAUSE if this status is threatened they can use NUKES.
56. Barak is not a wartime consigliere,
John Prophet   (11.18.11)
he will be replaced.
57. Barak has more honesty than his critics.
Li ,   USA   (11.18.11)
And that puts his critics in a low place.
58. The forces of Leftism
Brod ,   USA   (11.18.11)
The forces of Leftism are unrelenting in undermining Israel. The PM should not allow his Defense Minister to be running around in America or Europe to be interviewed by the forces of Leftism. Barak needs to know how to shut his mouth to protect Israel's national security interests.
59. Barak under fire over Iran comment
yoav ,   israel   (11.19.11)
He is intelligent and honest in the same time. A character hardly found in Israel. Why do we get upset if our politicians tell the truth ....do we want them to look and sound like liars all the time?
60. Barak really needs to go...
Jonathan   (11.20.11)
Don't want him anywhere near the cabinet if any new war is on its way...
Previous talkbacks
Next talkbacks
Back to article