News
US: Strike on Iran could hurt world economy
Reuters
Published: 18.11.11, 07:26
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
54 Talkbacks for this article
31. Bad for short term, GOOD for long term (end)
Robert ,   USA   (11.18.11)
32. If Iran uses nuclear bombs there will be no economy anywhere
Robert Blum ,   New Albany, USA   (11.18.11)
The oil-hungry, myopic, leftist, Jew-hating Europeans, concomitant with anti-Jewish = anti Israel North Korea, Russia, China and France, whose interests lie in Islam's oil as well as in the monies they gain from selling and building nuclear facilities in Islamic countries, contribute to the threat of nuclear attacks on Israel and on other nations perceived as threats or as undesirable nations by Islamic possessors of such weapons.
33. #26 Your "concern" is touching
Menachem ,   Israel   (11.18.11)
Israel will not only survive but will continue to thrive long after the industry of anti-Semitic lies is broke. Give my best regards to the Aboriginals, the true owners of Australia who suffer under your hypocritical colonialism.
34. Survival trumps the global economy
Zvi   (11.18.11)
What on earth prompts Panetta to say something so incalculably STUPID? For Israel - and for the Arabs of the Gulf - an Iranian nuclear weapon would be DISASTROUS. The Obama administration just doesn't Get It.
35. the kvetching superpower
Uncle Sam ,   Baltimore   (11.18.11)
The worst thing that can happen to the world economy is the dismantling of pax americana. If everyone gets nukes, or alternatively, if everyone sees Israel enforce the Non-Preliferation Treaty where the USA cowers in fear, everyone will see that US power has no meaning, because US leaders are cowards. Make no mistake, wars will erupt EVERYWHERE, when it is seen that there is no democratic superpower anywhere.
36. Iran
Alberto Nahum ,   Caesarea-Israel   (11.18.11)
Nuclear Iran is not dangerous but the Iranian government with nuclear power if it is, so must be eliminated at all costs, then the Iranian people will know if you should make bombs or build schools, hospitals achieve economic progress and welfare state .
37. Bush created, Obama ignores US Iran problem
David Turner ,   Richmond, USA   (11.18.11)
The US invades Iraq and creates an Iran problem which two presidents do their best to ignore. Had Bush followed the combined intelligence of most Arab states and Israel he would have attacked Iran, not Iraq in 2003. So now, nine years and a global recession later comes Leon Panetta to state the obvious, except having avoided Iranian provocations for a decade (to say nothing of the Bush team having been snookered into doing Iran the favor of eliminating its only credible enemy in the Arab world, Sadam); after losing nearly five thousand US and countless Iraqi lives to Iranian insurgents in Iraq; to being embarrassed continually by Iran tweaking Obama's nose regarding hollow deadlines and red lines: now, facing the choice of economic fallout today, or Iranian control over ME oil for decades with very predictable economic, social and military consequences: now Panetta cries "it's the economy stupid"? Its not the economy, stupid, its a cowardly retreat from responsibility. The US is a retiring giant that deserves what follows. But the damage it is doing in the process to other and innocent nations and peoples is unforgivable.
38. We must destroy Iran's nukes. Period.
Chaim ,   Israel   (11.18.11)
The economy isn't too important when one's nation has been destroyed by nuclear bombs. How dumb can Panetta, and his ilk, be? We must destroy Iran's nukes. Period.
39. Failureto do so will be far worse.
James ,   Raleigh US   (11.18.11)
Not only to the world economy, but to the safety of billions of innocent people. Quit pandering to an appeasement ideology, get your head out of the sand, and get a reality check!
40. #7
Jonathan ,   MN/US   (11.18.11)
I severly hope you're joking
41. US chicks out
Ze'ev ,   Nbg, germany   (11.18.11)
Seems that the US is not really interessted to stop iran from the annihilation of israel! Nice allies they are? Ken? Lo?
42. OBAMA
DANNY.TAWIL ,   ENGLAND   (11.18.11)
OBAMA IS WEAK .
43. Panetta's homily
Brod ,   USA   (11.18.11)
By harping his homily, Panetta seems to prefer seeing a mega Holocaust on Israel by way of the Ayatollahist nuke. Panetta should shut up. He does not represent Judeo-Christian America.
44. #7 is right.. it will be good for some
Ben ,   Chutzlaaretz   (11.18.11)
A shut down of Iran's Oil fields and limiting resource delivery from the Gold will seriousely enrich the Russians, the Venezuelans, North American Natural Gas and coal owners as well as re-boost the American Oil industry. Will it be painful for some.. for sure..others will get very very rich. But all that is immaterial! Israel and the US have a duty to protect their citizens from the Mad Mullahs regardless of the cost. What lefty morons and western Anti-semites simply do not get is that Israel is just the start for the Mullahs.. US is the "Big Satan" and the primary target! There is no appeasing them! Giving them Israel in favor of a few months/years grace is like feeding a lion your firend so that he doesn't eat you, while you are still in the same cage. You would think dumb anti-semites such as Split and his down-under friend would at least be worried about their own skin, but alas, their Jew Hatred is so great they don't mind seeing their own families die so long as the Jews go too.
45. To: No. 25
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (11.18.11)
You really are clueless. Iran is a backward, primitive country with an aging arsenal that wasn't very good in the first place, supplemented with Russian-manufactured materiel which is a joke. Israel is a modern, high-tech nuclear power. Unknown consequence? I think not. I think Israel can destroy Iran without raising much of a sweat and I also think that there is not very much that Iran can do about it. Iran is a strutting peacock. All sizzle, no steak.
46. Suppose you saw this headline from 1941...
shmulke ,   w coast, USA   (11.18.11)
"US Sec'ty of Defense: Strike on Germany could hurt world economy"
47. mr pineeta Keep You Nose Out Of Israeli
(11.18.11)
business, A Strike on iran will only Hurt iran as it should, just remember All Of This is by their (iran) Own Hands. Remember That!!!
48. To: Shmulke at No. 46
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (11.18.11)
Or this one from December 8, 1941: "U.S. Secretary of Defense: Strike on Japan could hurt world economy." Oh, we'd have really paid attention, right? LOL!
49. US.
SJOERD RUURD VDV ,   MULTIVERSE   (11.18.11)
A STRIKE ON IRAN WILL BE FOLLOWED BY A REACTION. IT CAN BE BETTER OUT OF THE QUESTION. ALSO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION HAS A DUTY/JOB TO DO TO SOLVE THAT POSSIBLE ISSUE IN A CIVLIZED WAY IN THAT CASE, I THOUGHT/THINK.
50. #25 It's always nice to hear views of a
Iranian Jew ,   LA   (11.19.11)
non Iranian on Israel security. Mahmood, please get the Iranian Monkey and his mullahs to stop threathening and supplying our enemies, and then maybe we'll back off. You are sitting in London and giving advises to people you don't even know.
51. The economy as a THREAT...
Armand ,   Los Angeles, USA   (11.19.11)
The appeasment ideology of the Obama administration is DESPICABLE...... # 44 and # 46 '' YOU NAILED IT '' Thank you.
52. They said the same thing about Hitler.
Steven Wilson ,   Anchorage, Alaska   (11.19.11)
He killed and killed Jews for a few more months of appeasing the Europeans and avoiding conflict in Europe. In the end though....the bloodletting begins in earnest. The sociopath comes out in the Iranian leader, as well as what happened with Hitler.....and no one wants to stop the carnage. Israel needs to remember what the West didn't do in WWII....as they stood by and let the leader of a country out of control....decimate the entire European continent as well as the lives of millions of Jews and others. A pre-emptive killing, can stop a war that is going to happen, whether we wait and sit around for another year on our hands. There is nothing shameful about protecting your countrymen.......the world will just have to sacrifice a little wait in a gas line...rather than the killing of six million Jews for the convenience of filling up their gas tanks with no waiting, in a line. Consequences.....6 million Jews dead.......compared to a little inconvenience of a blockage in the straits of Hormuz?????? That's a tough choice!
53. US Defense Budget
Mark ben Josef ,   USA   (11.19.11)
The US Defense budget goes down 10% if not Congressional deal is made in less than 4 days. That includes money for bombs and food and fuel and ammo for US troops in combat already. It also means cuts for their families' incomes. That also means cutting aid to the PA and Israel and Egypt and Jordan and Pakistan. The payments to Pakistan keep the supply lines open to US and NATO in Pakistan and sometimes slow the attacks on US troops in the region. But Israel will do what it plans, whatever that is, regardless.
54. HEARTY LAUGH...................................#45
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (11.19.11)
To your response to my talk-back.We,together,laughed and had enough of it reading your talk-back. That is the reason why you are still on planning stages,aren't you?
Previous talkbacks
Back to article