News
Iranian minister: Israeli strike would be suicide
Dudi Cohen
Published: 26.12.11, 09:45
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
82 Talkbacks for this article
61. To # 19
Bigizz ,   USA / Israel   (12.26.11)
Are you really a Cohen??
62. #60: Sarah B
OJ ,   Lebanon   (12.26.11)
"Israel" did intact pay too much attention to collateral damage. That was all you could accomplish in the war, collateral damage then blaming Hezbollah for it. Haha... Habibi, you seem to think your country is invincible. Like I said, if you were as strong as you think you are, you would of have attacked Iran by now ;) Salam
63. SARAH,GIVE IT UP.............................#59
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (12.26.11)
As all relevant authorities reports from USA to Fare East have,months back,acknowledged the fact that the Iranians managed to control the damage,rectified their equipments and today you witness,that Busheir is running at 40% of its capacity.How are the neighbouring countries receiving electricity from Iran?Burning of charcoal? All you have to do is to pick on numerous articles on the Natanz facilities as well.What is the next trip of IAEA representatives supposed to see in Natntz in January? You are indeed a joke,Sarah.However hard you try,you can't fool every reader of Ynet.Rest assured.
64. ISRAEL PAYING TOO MUCH.............#60
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (12.26.11)
Attention to collateral damage?Since when have you come up with this funny thought?Oh,I realise that you have begun to accept the defeat and find solace in making us believe what you write.My foot...............push of a button.What button are you talking about.Give it up Sarah,you have done enough to fooll many readers.But it is enough now.Come down to reality.
65. #50, the number is most likely exaggerated and it's not like
Henry from New York ,   USA   (12.26.11)
they will all be fired at once. They might launch several hundred from Lebanon, but then the IAF might retaliate with impunity. As for Iran, 100 million rockets is highly unlikely and it's doubtful their range is that far (are there small rockets that can go that far?). They might have several hundred Scud missiles which are of some concern though.
66. especially with US made bunker buster bombs
joe rechtman ,   ca usa   (12.26.11)
67. #64: Mahmoud
OJ ,   Lebanon   (12.26.11)
She seems to talk a lot about the strength of "Israel." which is ironic because I bet during wars she would be living in the USA safe and sound from Hezbollah missiles while other "Israeli" are in danger. Her warmongering is just Internet warmongering and the Knesset seems to be a little bit down to Earth because even though really want to, they haven't attacked Iran yet.
68. Ahmad Vahidi
Michael ,   Whittier USA   (12.26.11)
If he saw how deceived he is, he'd be terrified!
69. #50 Lebanon became a parking lot
Cynthia ,   USA   (12.26.11)
1200 dead, 4000 injured and disabled, billions in damage. And you're threatening more rockets? If you want to live a long peaceful life then you must get rid of Hezbollah and Uncle Islamic Regime Iran. They bring the region nothing but trouble. When Iran threatens Israel they also threaten Lebanon and all the neighbors including the Palestinians. You're correct on that point.
70. To: No. 63
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (12.26.11)
If things are all so hunky-dory in the Islamic Republic, why are Bushehr and Natanz off-line? Hmm? And then there was that DREADFUL accident at Isfahan. Dearie, dearie me. So many accidents in Iran. Perhaps the Islamic Republic should concentrate on bringing indoor plumbing to the 75% of the country that does NOT have it, instead of worrying about becoming a nuclear power. As if Israel would let that happen! But outhouses are so seventeenth century. Join the modern world, why don't you?
71. To: Henry at No. 65
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (12.26.11)
Darling, you know better. Several hundred? Are you serious? Lebanon will be turned into a giant glowing cinder before the second missile ever flies. We'll give them the benefit of the doubt for the first one, but after that -- all bets are off. Besides, Hezbollah's missile stores suffered a truly unfortunate accident a few weeks ago. Something about an Israeli Trojan Horse drone ..... They're no match for us. Never have been; never will be. If we take the gloves off -- and we will -- Lebanon will disappear into the annals of history, and Israel will have a nice new northern border. I always did love cedar trees; don't you?
72. @ Mahmood of UK and #64 of Lebanon
(12.27.11)
Mahmood of UK! If you think Sarah’s postings are just useless then why would you even answer them? You accuse her of exaggerating the strength of Israel. You keep talking about how great Iran is. I’m an Iranian. I know my country. It is not as great as you think it is. I have also lived and studied in Israel. I have a pretty good idea of what Israel may or may not do in a case of war. I have also witnessed the empty talks of the mullahs in Iran with my own eyes. I have seen people suffering in Iran until this date. I know how political echelon works in Iran. Stop pounding your chest about it. It is not pretty. We (Iranians) are light years behind other countries. There is nothing there to be proud of. We were proud once and it is all ruined now by the mullahs. Whatever Israel may or may not do, will not show on the surface. You can be sure of that. You and the mullahs can chest pound all day long. Winning is not about who shouts the loudest. Israel has already won this war in any way or form you can imagine. Being such small country that has already past light years of mullahs and a country with such vast resources as Iran. Too bad it’s is in the hands of useless minds such as yourself and the mad monkey. I am 100% sure that you are not Iranian. You know nothing about Iran. Calling yourself Mahmood of UK speaks volume of how scared you are to even show where you really coming from. So if you really unhappy with Sarah then simply stop reading and writing to this paper. Peace
73. #64 Mahmood of UK..
Iranian Jew ,   LA   (12.27.11)
DUDE! You are not Iranian. Stop defending on behalf of us. You have no clue what is happening in Iran. Mhy country does not need your help. Maybe it's time for you to come down to earth where reality is as well.
74. #63
Dan ,   U.S.A.   (12.27.11)
She never shuts up. That's why I said she's annoying in a earlier post. The woman just has to be the center of attention all the time.
75. #65 HIenry
BEN JABO ,   ISRAEL   (12.27.11)
Be careful with your math, "100 million rockets", what do you think, they are grains of sand on the beach?
76. #64 & 67 TWO JERKS TALKING
BEN JABO ,   ISRAEL   (12.27.11)
Estmaite the number of Arabs that won't be killed if a new war starts As far as I know, nobody, as yet, has been able to design destructive devices that can determine what your religion is OJ - The original OJ was also a loser Iran has been threatening Israel for years, when push comes to shove & it looks like Iran is on the verge of realizing her nightmare, we will do the usual, take out the Iranian nukes, just as we did to the Iraqi & Syrian Enjoy your wet dreams, that's all you're going to get.. Last time half of Lebanon was destroyed, next time, nothing will be left..You'll be able to use your rockets as personal suppositories
77. Choice ranting & drum beating on this one
Cameron ,   USA   (12.27.11)
78. AGAIN WRONG SARAH.......................#70
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (12.27.11)
Challenging you to give one piece of evidence to prove that the Busheir plant is not operating?You don't have any except your personal belief in your thick head.It is not only operational because the Iranians say so,even the foreigners visit to the plant showed how active the plant is.Why don't you give up your wild dreams? So is the case with Natanz facilities.What do you mean by off-line?Read your own press for the latest.Oh,to you all that is rubbish,isn't it? What Israel has been able to do or will be able to do is,once again,your own dream as no one else wants to even know about that.
79. OFF BALANCE.......................................#72
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (12.27.11)
To start with,I don't need your opinion on why I respond to Sarah's posting.She leaves in a dream-world and we all enjoy her postings as she has no choice but to hover around few articles on Iran. further,no one has made any attempts to portray Iran's strength as such.If you consider Iran to be so weak the way Sarah portraye it to be,I wonder if you ask yourself ass to why the reluctancy to attack its Nuclear facilities and get away with it?Come down to reality,whoever you are. If you collect all the postings of Sarah for the last six years or so,you will by now believe(although you ARE almost) that nothing like Iran exists at all.she has few selected sentences which she puts it in different ways to.Stupid people like yourself get carried away by the writing she posts.Give you an example...................the latest drone episode whereby the Iranians managed to land the drone on their soil and once again,President Obama literally asked for it back from Iran makes Sarah feel that there is nothing like drone being downed by the Iranians and all these stories about the drone is all a make-up.What do you do with Sarah now? I dont need to know more about Iran,thank you.The Western press feeding is enough for us to ascertain what is going on.May be,may be,you need to know where you are,at this juncture.
80. #79
Bob ,   U.S.A.   (12.28.11)
You keep talking about this drone that Iran supposedly landed on the ground (yeah right). With a big of a deal as this is to Israel, U.S.A., Europe, and any other civilized nation, do you really think that there is just that one drone looking down on Iran. If you are that delusional, then I think that it is time that you put down the proverbial pen and stop writing. If Iran had the power to take over the command and control structure of a U.A.V, then there would be a lot more taken down and paraded for all to see the glorious strength of Iran the weak. From being in the military at one time there is one thing that I can guarantee, American military believes in redundancy. There has been, and still is several U.A.V.'s over Iran at any one time. Why are they not on the ground as well?
81. ABSOLUTELY..................................#80
MAHMOOD ,   LONDON-UK   (12.28.11)
I wonder,too.Let us assume that the drone decided on its own to land in the Iranian territory,what a marvel performance indeed.By the way,I too,read what you do except for the difference being that when the Iranians claim about something,I tend to find out what others say about the same.You being in USA,should be in a better position to find out what President Obama was asking the Iranians to give back when he did so...........what was it,Bob.A kite?:) Your prediction about other drones flying over Iran is also of great interest,indeed.Well,let us agree with you that the Iranians don't have the capabilities to bring them down.I have no problem with that theory so long as it lists you out of the way.
82. For Gods Sake !!
Mike ,   New Zealand   (01.21.13)
Shut up all of you . . . isint it best to keep ones mouth closed and act stupid than open it and remove all doubt ! War is a terrible thing and innocent people on both sides die. Is this what you all want ?
Previous talkbacks
Back to article