33. To: No. 25
Sarah B , |
U.S.A. / Israel |
|
(01.01.12) |
Hmmm. Lots of words, nothing substantive. For example, you failed entirely to explain why the turbine at Bushehr remains inoperative. There is considerable evidence that the rods have been removed, too. For that matter, Iran is desperatey trying to acquire centrifuges (so much for its self-proclaimed vaunted second and third generation centrifuges that rival anything in the West) or the tensile steel to build them (yeah, good luck with that one -- your country doesn't have the capability of building toilets, let alone centrifuges).
In any event, Natanz is wholly non-operational -- as confirmed by the IAEA -- and there was just that TERRIBLE accident at Isfahan.
Disappointed? Qui, moi? Not likely. STUXNET and DUQU have taught your nasty country exactly what Israel is capable of, and it will only get worse going on.
Iran will NOT become nuclear. Whatever it takes, and I assure you that Israel's arsenal is far more capable than Iran's. On every level.
Why haven't you returned to Iran to defend the ramparts, as it were? Or does your wife simply dislike the hijab and chador? Is that what is keeping you from putting your feet where your mouth and your loyalties lie? I wonder, do the British realize how disloyal you are? Perhaps one should inform them.
|