Don't attempt terrorist attacks on Israel; don't die. Otherwise .... your choice. Where can I send some weeds or, given the ersatz "Palestinian" bent, where can I send some sweets? Everybody loves a Milky Way bar. Dark chocolate or milk chocolate?

Sarah B. you tells us who, and what you are daily pretty soon there won't be anything left.

While I enjoy your posts daily.... may I point out, while it good that we kill Amalek, we should not cheer. Arab vermin cheer our deaths with sweets... we should not dothe same... with that said kol ha kavod Zahal!

Yes, I am a very smart woman. So you can believe me when I PROMISE you that there will very shortly be nothing left of Gaza and the terrorist rabble it harbors. We've grown quite tired of dealing with you. Bye-bye. Don't worry, though. Another thing I can absolutely PROMISE you is that I will be there to pass out sweets. That is a promise I have every intention of keeping.

Who wouldn't cheer eliminating diseased vermin?

is this normal conduct-he says israel does not want to do a gaza operation but then says we may have to do it. he says iran is close to nuclear weaponization and something has to be done and then says a decision is far away. Barak's threats are empty except of small suprise strikes that might eliminate a few operatives. As for major land warfare, he has never been good at it. His MO is to run away from training accident, to run away from lebanon, to avoid hitting iraqi and syrian nuclear facitlities and to underequip commandos wiht paintball guns. To have such a person as defence minnister tells me israel is not ready for nationhood.No self respecting nation would have such a failure run the defence of the nation.

As a retired professional soldier, killing people is never a good thing. I keep hoping beyond hope that one day the Arabs wake and figure out they are their own worst enemy and leave us alone. I will not live to see, nor my grandchildren - but I still hope. And never ever celebrate anybody's death. My worse curse that I can think of is that with their deaths it made the world a better place and that is what happened.

Killing people is not a good thing, but killing terrorists bent on killing innocents most definitely is. You need to distinguish between the two. Am Yisrael Chai!! :)

It depends on who is being killed. If someone could have killed Adolph Hitler before he rose to power certainly that would have been a good thing. It's unfortunate that there will probably always be people in the world whose greatest gift to humanity will be to die and leave the world a better place.

What are you going to do Gaza? Kill 1,5 million people? Or nuke Gaza? Is that your "smart" solution? Either you are a paid Israeli propaganda machine, or you are someone reached a level beyond medication.

#1, #5, and #6,,, These are not my comments.......... Sarah B. notice the punctuation!!

Not all of Gaza. What is wrong with you. Gaza is under the control of demented fanatics. Those killed are terrorists trying to kill Israelis. If you can not see it, is because you are blind and brain damage. The people in Gaza will one day remove the yoke of the fanatics like Hamas, Islamic jihad, al aqsa martyrs And all the manure os Islamic fanatics.

Israel having LEFT gaza Israel has no business in Gaza. It is the inalienable right of the oppressed to fight their oppressors. to "target the citizens and soldiers of the State of Israel " on Palestinian land is therefore the God given right of the besieged and beleaguered Palestinians whose only crime is that Israel covet their land.

The posts at Nos. 1, 5 and 6 are very definitely mine. (Way too many incorrectly placed commas by the imposter at No. 12. And never, ever put a comma before the word "and." Shorten the ellipsis, as well -- three in a paused thought, four at the end of a sentence.)

Collateral damage can be a bitch. Just ask the surviving family members of the 100,000 civilians killed in indiscriminate bombing runs by the United States Air Force in Afghanistan, Iraq and Waziristan -- supposedly to weed out terrorists and insurgents. (That's a low estimate, by the way. Certain human rights group put the civilian death toll at four or five times that number.) Israel, on the other hand, has had to endure 10,000 missiles fired from Gaza into its civilian areas in the South. Why should a different set of rules apply to Israel than that which the U.S. invoked for its own use?

Israel has every right to respond with whatever degree of force it deems necessary to stop terrorist attacks on Israeli civilians. One thing you can count on: Gaza will come out very much the worse for wear.

Why on earth would I put the plight of Gazans ahead of my concerns for the safety and security of Israelis in the south of Israel? They wanted autonomy; they have it. Now they have to live with the consequences of choosing terrorists to lead them.

There are no exceptions for the death of anybody. I do not see any person's death as a reason for celebration. For some there is no saddness either. Terrorists and other individuals are merely getting what they have coming, but that is still no cause to celebrate - those are actions of the Arabs and I for one do not want to be anything like them.

Your post is nonsense-what are you trying to say.

Oh,what a sweet day that will be.

so how are Gazans oppressed by Israel? While I laugh at your attempt to present a logic (and lawful) argument, the truth is - Hamas has declared war on Israel in 2007 and every person who is involved in hostilities is therefore a legitimate target per the Geneva Convention. These two terrorists were legitimate targets. Were they putting bombs on the fence to hit Israeli WHEN they are in Gaza? Hell no - the bombs are to go off to kill Israelis when they are in Israel but next to the fence. The fact that they would target civilians, even if in Gaza, is proof of their war crimes and terrorist intentions. The fact that you justify it is the most disturbing thing here.

Slow down Sarah B. you are becoming very predictable.