News  World News
Friedman: Obama possibly most pro-Israel president ever
Ynet
Published: 07.03.12, 10:08
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
110 Talkbacks for this article
61. friedman's angle
tom ,   toronto, canada   (03.07.12)
mr friedman seems to be angling for a job, as the new "propaganda czar" in the obama white house.
62. FRIED-MAN
Sy Dill ,   Providence, RI   (03.07.12)
Is it possible, nae I dare say, probable, that we Jews have our own "Uncle Tom?"
63. Friedman is 100% correct
John R ,   NYC USA   (03.07.12)
Bibi should speak reality. Reality is that an Israeli airstrike would at best delay Iran's nuclear program by 18months (based on Israel's own Military's assessment) Iran's most sophisticated enrichment facility is under 250 ft of granite mountain. An airstrike would do nothing to it. They have enough raw material for 4 bombs which only need additional enrichment to be useable. This is not Syria or Iraq. This is a country that believes they are developing the ultimate defense against a US invasion. The only way peacefully to stop their nuclear program is for Israel to transfer its nuclear bombs and enrichment facilities to a neutral party if Iran simultaneously does the same and agrees to unfettered inspections. Sanctions would also need to be lifted. Unfettered inspections work and if Iran prevented them in the future you can always return to the status quo. Denuclearizing the whole Middle East is the only way Iran can save face if they discontinue their nuclear program after all they have spent on it. The only other way to guarantee they stop their nuclear program is a US invasion. It's not going to happen. That is reality.
64. To quote Bill Engval ... "there's your sign!"
J Galt ,   Hidden Valley, USA   (03.07.12)
65. yossi olmert friedman
marcel   (03.07.12)
friedman got a masters degree in oriental studies and drank coffee in beirut with arabs and looks in the mirror and decided he is an expert. beilin got a ph.d. and though weak,w eak in his bones decided that he knew what makes arabs tick to peace. Finally olmert believed his ownheadlines tha the was a prince and lost the hezbollah war and ran after assad and erdgoan to give away israel's security. Friedman encapsulates the worst of the three and damaged israeli sovereigntly and self respect. Any words coming from these guys coming at conferences or articles is worth tossing into the garbage.
66. Obama as seen thru the eyes of a ...
jack ,   San Diego, USA   (03.07.12)
...self hating Jew.
67. #63 John R, NYC USA
Albrecht Klein ,   Germany   (03.07.12)
New York City will be one of the primary target of Iranian ICBMs. Duck and cover.
68. designed to butter up the Jewish vote
Galut ia ,   Selah   (03.07.12)
69. And if Friedman is wrong, he goes home to his mansion.
Raymond in DC ,   Washington, USA   (03.07.12)
The story is told of an American diplomat hectoring his Israeli counterpart about what Israel "should" do, that it should "take risks", etc. Finally, the Israeli turned to the American and said, "And if it doesn't work out, you'll go back to Chevy Chase [a well to do suburb of Washington], but we'll have to live with the consequences." As it happens, Friedman lives in a multimillion dollar mansion not far from Chevy Chase.
70. it is naive to assume Iran will faithfully negotiate
Galut ia ,   Selah   (03.07.12)
they have a religious goal to eliminate Israel as a nation and they negotiate with that in mind....
71. I like to look at history for the answers
The Mad Zionist ,   SF-NY-IS   (03.07.12)
Every campaign Israel chose to act when threatened ended up in victory. There are a couple campaigns that come to mind that the US was upset that Israel didn't warn her, but the object was completed. So there's this one time I remember where an Israeli PM Golda took the advice of the Americans and d for the first time Israel did not act pre-emptively and the results were catastrophic, borderline grave. Israel must do what she needs to do to protect herself. I'm a little more concerned about the Israeli designers more at this point, but in hindsight History will be on Israels side when the dust settles. I don't know what's going on behind closed doors in Israel, but Israel should not let outside influences get in the way. All I can say is that thank God Netanyahu is PM now and not Olmert. Even though olmert attacked one Syrian reactor, he would not be able to resist Obama Admin avertions. History is on Israels side, there's no hiding the true natureof the Iranian Regime, it MUST be stopped!!! Jake S.
72. #65 Marcel
The Mad Zionist ,   SF-NY-IS   (03.07.12)
Right on, loved that! Jake
73. Mr. Friedman you are a fool.
Maurice ,   Los Angeles, USA   (03.07.12)
You are just a little Obama crony who is desperate to get him re-elected. Not only Obama is the worst president for Israel/US relations, he the worst president ever for America. I hope Americans don't fall for it again in November.
74. Friedman is an cowardly idiot !!
Don Rosenberg ,   Palatine USA   (03.07.12)
He is a disgrace to all Jewish people with guts. The liberal Jews would sell out their mothers to make a buck ingratiating themselves with racist muslims and christians. These guilt ridden cowards were the first ones to turn in their fellow Jews in WW2.
75. show me a quote
mason jefferies ,   redwood city ca   (03.07.12)
you guys are all revisionists of history its so funny how easily you all forget that this pro palestinian obama who hates israel VETOED PALESTINAN APPLICATION FOR STATEHOOD. if he was soooooo pro palestinain if he hated israel sooooooo much like most of the people on this page are saying why the hell would he deny the Palestinain application for statehood????
76. Response to#67
John R ,   NYC USA   (03.07.12)
The old Soviet Union had over 1500 ICBM's pointed at us for forty years. I'm used to it.
77. hahahahahahaha!
David ,   USA/Israel   (03.07.12)
I didn't have to read the article. I just read the title and spit my false teeth on the floor!
78. Friedman is idiotic
Brod ,   USA   (03.07.12)
If Friedman thinks Obama is the most pro-Israel, he is idiotic. Obama is a master of election time. Once he wins, he will start bullying Israel into submission, forcing Israel to give away her GOD-GIVEN and GOD-RESTORED Land of Israel to the Islamist-Jihadists so that they can shower and terrorize Israel with more rockets to achieve their goal of destroying Israel as stipulated in their Charter, School Textbooks and Maps. Obama has put her AntiSemite agent named Susan Rice at the UN to attack Israel. He surrounds himself with Associates/Advisers who are Papist AntiSemites like Samantha Powers, Biden, Pannetta...and Islamist-Jihadist like Rashid Khalidi...
79. #63 John R
Phil ,   Ireland   (03.07.12)
When are you going to pay attention to reality? Do you really think Iran would hand over its nuclear program to "a neutral party"? Your naivity knows no bounderies!
80. forget Iran. Friedman is the real threat
(03.07.12)
81. Friedman re Israel
Syd Chaden ,   Palermo Calif USA   (03.07.12)
Friedman says that only the US can take out the Iranian nuclear capability, but it is premature to do that ""now. "Now" is before the next election. Obama needs Jewish contributions and votes, and so, "now", he is the best friend that Israel ever had. After the election, if he wins, Obama will be back to his "new approach to the Muslim World", and Friedman can return to writing commentaries on why support for Israel is counter to US interests. Obama wants to make the Muslim World happy, and the only thing that will do that is the destruction of Israel. American Jewish voters need to decide if they want to reelect Obama, or if they want Israel to survive. It may be a difficult choice for them to make, but it is much simpler to anguish over a Holocaust that has already occurred, than it is to face up to one that is in the offing, and act to prevent it.
82. Thomas Friedman
Jeff Grill ,   Phoenix, USA   (03.07.12)
I guess Mr. Friedman also believes in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy. Obama is the most anti-Israeli President to occupy the White House. Friedman is a feckless, miscreant who should take up residence in Gaza.
83. To #75
Maurice ,   Los Angeles, USA   (03.07.12)
If it had been only up to him, he would have approved the PA bid but his own party did not let him (There are still a few democrats with some brain). So he had to go along. Obama will never be Israel's friend.
84. Saying Obama is "pro Israel"
Rivka Arieli ,   Vancouver BC Canada   (03.07.12)
Lots of words, much contradictory, and NO action. Explain how this is "pro Israel"??? Regan and Bushes were pro Israel in actions!
85. mason jefferies #75 wrong
Gee ,   Zikron Yaakov   (03.07.12)
"pro palestinian obama who hates israel VETOED PALESTINAN APPLICATION FOR STATEHOOD." When exactly did this veto happen? I challenge to provide such proof. I will state right here right now that Odumba did no such thing.
86. friedman all wrong about so much
moron ,   galut   (03.07.12)
a weak defeated america no friend of israel or itself.
87. Supporter of Israel
(03.07.12)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wbH5KVPrPo
88. Response to#79
John R ,   NYC USA   (03.07.12)
Yes. Because of an Iranian defector and electronic and ground surveilence,we know where all their facilities are located. If the offer is made they can say "We rid the Middle east of Israeli nukes". There is huge prestige in that and face saving since they spent a fortune in nuclear development. There is no question the sanctions are hurting them but once the Euro-zone bans importation of Iranian oil and all the banking restrictions are in place( all by next month )they will start to run out of hard currency. Between the carrot and the stick and avoiding any military embarrassment, yes I think they will do it. I should also say so do the Saudis believe they will do it. I'm willing to offer it. Israel could defend itself in any conventional war provided its adversary doesn't have nuclear weapons. Israel should have never introduced those weapons in the Middle East to begin with because they started this arms race. I just gave you reality but you are too naive to face it. By the way, what's your great solution?
89. #85 is right
Maurice ,   Los Angeles, USA   (03.07.12)
Obama never had to veto the PA bid because they withdrew their application prior to the vote. He probably would have vetoed it not because he is Israel's friend but because of his own party's pressure. The PA did not want to embarrass their friend in the White house so they withdrew their application.
90. Response to#79 continued
John R ,   NYC USA   (03.07.12)
I mentioned the Saudis because if Israel can't negotiate a nuclear free Middle East, the Saudis are the next ones who will be developing nuclear weapons along with the Egyptians. Is Israel going to bomb them too? Your not simply naive, you're downright stupid.
Previous talkbacks
Next talkbacks
Back to article