News  World News
Panetta: US attack on Iran would be more effective
Yitzhak Benhorin
Published: 09.03.12, 00:19
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
35 Talkbacks for this article
31. #30 Rafi. Through the eyes of a useful idiot.
Chaim ,   Israel   (03.09.12)
#30.Panetta did not offer Israel any support. In fact, the Obama regime's clear intention is to discourage Israel from defending herself. Obama feels Israel saving herself will harm his reelection prospects. You see through the eyes of useful idiot, Rafi.
32. just one attack...
PB ,   Australia   (03.09.12)
Pity it will likely be the Chinese or Russians, not the Iranians. Oh well, you just keep asking for it, and the outbreak of peace that would follow would make it at least worth it. Imagine a world without the endless, whining demands of Israel, Heaven!
33. Now, now, Noodles
Cameron ,   USA   (03.09.12)
One must be patient when expecting others to attack & wage war on Israel's behalf. We'll move no faster on the Persian issue than Israel did when it finally stirred and got off it's fat to do something about Hezbollah and Gaza. Such are the times, Noodles.
34.  Pinheada, more effective?
David ,   USA/Israel   (03.09.12)
In his pin headed way of thinking! However, The fact is, Israel could send Iran back to the stone age in 10 minutes if she wished! Give them a little shuv Israel!
35. AFTER whatever happens: Balance ONLY via SECURE BIG ISRAEL.
Jerry ,   The Netherlands   (03.09.12)
Previous talkbacks
Back to article