This was a BLACK day for Israel. We have completely lost our vision.

Zionists, then something is FLAWED within the High Court ! It's most important duty has to be the PROTECTION of the rights of the most supportive citizens of the Jewish state !

Israel needs a revolution.

WITH A ARAB SUPREME COURT WHO WON'T STAND FOR ATIKVAH AND PEACE NOW FINANCED BY THE BILLIONAIRE ANTI SEMITE GEORGE SOROS,WHAT DID WE EXPECT.

But Zionism was originally not designed to occupy the West Bank,no matter what religious or other reasons may be proposed.The problem is,that we only hear from extreme right wing voices.Most of us dont agree with taking land and evictions and lack of respect for others,but are too afraid to stand up and be counted

wanted? Seems to me they got their in spades... weren't they doing better they that terrible leftie Supreme Court? 2 funny...they forgot that the real right has greater might than their false right! stop sobbin' start packin'

Now the the Right must live with the fact that they voted for Netanyahu and they know that sooner or later he will give back most, if not all the "Occupied" Territories to the terrorists! They can't even blame Beinish! Of course, whether we like it or not, THE LAW IS THE LAW and that is the way court must go otherwise the country will descend to anarchy. As for your comment Rachel well, you should think before you put finger to keyboard. Netanyahu will ALWAYS do what is best for Netanyahu. That is what we Israelis have to live with. Clean up your own Obaminable house and then come on Aliyah and clean up ours!

And the "high court" with Bibi's help will make sure of that. Do they not understand they will also all be out of a job?

so really take your dooms day drivel down the drain with yourself attached! Ridiculous fool

illegally built arab houses? All arab structures were illegally built on Jewish land! We need a government that will bulldoze the hcj and put everyone that worked there from the president of the court to the tea lady in prison forever. bibi should become the new word for coward. We need new elections now and we need to rid the knesset of bibi,barak, livni, moo fass and all the non Zionist parties. Then we need to investigate where all the n.g.o.s are getting their money.

While I am completely for Israeli Settlements, everywhere in Ha Eretz, In this case, where the settlers built on private land belonging to so-called palestinians, I need to acknowledge that the court did right in rejecting the settlement. Had the settlement been on public land, it would have worked.

The court is suposed to judge between litagents based on the law, not tell the law makers, the police, the radio, the newpapers what they can and can not do. The Judges have overstepped their roles of decided legal issues and have gone head long into politics. this is very bad for the state and for justice.

..and it has been called as such for the past 4000 years. Jordan created the name "West Bank" in the early 1950s. Occupation can ONLY take place when State A conquers State B's territory as a result of war. There was no "Palestinian" state in 1967, 1949, 1948, 1947, 100 , 200, 500, 1000, 5000, 10.000 or 100.000 years ago. No "Palestinian" state has ever existed in recorded history. Therefore there is no "occupation". Many ancient civilizations among them the Jews/Israelites themselves, but also Phoenicians, Philisteenes, Canaanites, Edomites, Egyptians, Hittites, Babylonians, Assyrians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, the Byzantine Empire and the Arabs ALL mention the Jewish people and Israel - both as an independent/sovereign Israelite/Jewish kingdom and also Israel in the sense of the land of Israel. None of these civilizations have ever mentioned any "Palestinian" people or state - not once. Why? Is it extremist to point out that our Jewish homeland is de facto our land? Only we Jews have historical right to this land. You are extremely igorant of history. Zionism has existed for 2000 years of Jewish exile, but Zionism as a political movement came into being in the late 19th century. The purpose of Zionism was the reestablishment of a Jewish state in the ancestral Jewish homeland. There was no mentioning of "West Bank", "Palestinians" or "occupation". Zionism intended to resettle the land of Israel - and to be more exact the land area designated by the San Remo treaty in 1920 which includes Cis-Jordan (including Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, Gaza and Golan), Trans-Jordan and southern Lebanon up until the bend of the Litani River. The political hysteria concerning "Palestinians" and "occupation" started in 1967. We Jews have HISTORICAL (not only religious bonds) and LEGAL rights to Israel. What EXACT connection do Arabs have to Israel? What we patriots of Israel don't understand is why Tel Aviv or Jerusalem is more Israeli than Judea and Samaria. If you think we are "stealing" "Palestinian" land, then why not extend your ideology to all of Israel? The 1949 armistice line is an armistice line remind you - no permanent border.

What do you know about Zionism, you luni..Wish, I could tell you all I want... FYI, the so-called West Bank has a name :Judea and Samaria or Yehuda and Shomron...And by its ancient name alone, that area has its only natural and hisotrical owner for thousands of years: Israel . We didn't just take the land, mr. exUK...We faught for every inch of it..And we Won...By every rule of engagement, to the Victors should go the "spoils".. It is very obvious, that the problem here is not the so-called WB, but the existence of the tiny Jewish state in the Ocean of the hostile Islamic countries..And if you are really in Tel-Aviv, shame on You...Go back to UK !

Netanyahu will worse than Sharon.

Go back to the UK, you dont have the baitzim to live in Israel.

There is no proof that the land (Migron) belongs to Arabs.

no land for peace and no return of arab refugees-

Now its time to demolish the illegal settlements.

it is very important that Israel rises to the defence of Migron. There is but one homeland. Not one step back.

The high court of Israel seemed to believe otherwise. The settlements will prosper in spite of this problem. Shalom.

May God bless all of you, there in Israel, who fought and were victors against an ocean of hostile islamic countries. You deserve the spoils of your victory; forever.

If you are so completely for Israeli settlements, then where exactly would you approve for Israel to build their homes and communities ? And by who's definition do you think, the land of Migron belongs to the palestinians ? Isn't Migron situated in Yehuda and Shomron, which is our 6000 years old land ? Plus, we have deliberated it over defensive wars, waged on us for a total destruction !...You said:"Had the settlement been on public land"? Do you think we are discussing Alaska here ? The Israeli city of Migron is situated exactly where it should be : In the heart of Judea and Samaria...Seems to me, you are more for settling and much less for settlements...The lessons of our history teach to refrain from exactly such actions...Besides, what is your proof, that that land is owned the palestinians...

the ocialist highcourt institutionalized racism against jews, as it refuses to issuee similar decisions against arabs. we laugh at europe on their fear for arabs and islam violence and the cort spits at us

There are no more "petitioners". Peace Now withdrew their petition on behalf of the Arabs on Nov. 7, 2011 because that was the deadline for them to provide proof of ownership & they had none. The Migron residents were never given a chance to prove their ownership. The case should've been closed when the petition was withdrawn. This is purely a political decision by the left-wing court. Judicial activism has no place in a democracy. The court does not have the right to determine policy.

Who appointed you the spokesperson for all Israelis?