News  World News
Iran's FM hopes talks to mark end of nuke issue
AFP
Published: 24.04.12, 23:41
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
9 Talkbacks for this article
1. The way to end the Iranian nuclear issue is either...
Alexander ,   Tel Aviv, Israel   (04.25.12)
...for Iran to dismantle its nukes or for Israel to destroy Iran - and everything and everyone in it. The "talks" are meaningless: they just keep stalling the problem and aims at pacifying Israel and preventing us from defending ourselves. It's former US President Jimmy Carter's fault that the Shah of Iran was toppled and replaced by the Islamic lunatics. Now, Obama want's to be Carter II and be meek and submissive towards the Iranian Islamic fanatics. Despotic countries -particularly those of Mid Eastern and Islamic character understand only brute military force forcing them to abstain from all and any violent activities and intentions. Israel's enemies only understand the language of an iron fist turning them into beaten up and bruised human vegetables. This is the reality of the Middle East and there is no point in denying it and pretending that avoiding a direct confrontation will make the enemy forget his evil ways and he will start to love us. It doesn't work that way. Never did and never will. Israel's policy towards Iran should be: immediate unconditional surrender or immediate unconditonal annihilation. Which of these two do the Iranians want? Israel should not ask. Israel should demand. We are a military power to reckoned with and other countries had better watch their step with us. This includes Iran.
2. More delaying tactics
John   (04.25.12)
More delaying tactics, attack now !
3. Mr, Salehi, I also see an end to the Iranian nuke issue,
Noodles ,   Coney Island   (04.25.12)
Just a different way of getting to said destination...hehehe.
4. Alexander @#1 deserves
Israeli 2   (04.25.12)
"The Only Talkback on This Issue Necessary" award. Excellent!
5. Get a grip...
Cyrus ,   LA   (04.25.12)
WOW, reading you post, I wondering who is the violent one lol
6. @#2
Miguel ,   San Diego   (04.25.12)
Your comment implies 1 thing and 1 thing only, that might makes right. The HUGE and glaring problem with your supposition is that, while Israel has a significant military capability, threats of this nature (unconditional surrender or unconditional annihilation) only promote the desire in your neighbors to acquire the same defensive deterrent capability you are now brandishing. You're essentially providing incentive to your neighbors to increase their military strength, and are establishing precedent that encourages military struggle against you. Further, the moment someone acquires parity, or what they perceive to be a military advantage, they will use it to the same, cajoling degree you now espouse. This is the type of military braggadocio that we diaspora folks cringe at.
7. What Was The Point Of This Empty Story
(04.25.12)
What was the content or information for reader's to understand? Alexander Your Points Are Spot on, as Usual, I Wish The West Would just Stay Out Of All Israeli Internal Matters!!! obumer Will Never Act in Israel's Interests, the great oritor Just Talks out of the side of his neck. The Best Defence Is A Better OFFENCE. אלכסנדר ייתכן שהמילים שלך להתגשם למציאות.
8. Nuclear Iran
Istvan ,   BUDAPEST HUNGARY   (04.25.12)
This whole madness is invented by a single, antisemitism infected man., Ahmadinejad. If the other leaders of Iran are more realistic, give no more support for him, so the danger of nuclear Iran is minimal, I think so.
9. Oh yes, a bear hug from Obama is for SURE !
Chris Rettenmoser ,   Bayerisch Gmain Germ   (04.25.12)
Back to article