Don't worry about anything Sarah B writes. S/he is just an agent provocateur looking to aggravate people. Don't feed the troll.

The Guardian is a racist rag it's writers and posters are the nastiest anti-Semitic writers who constantly smear Israel.They have non stop articles full of lies and misinformation on Israel.Pro Israeli posters here should log to to the Guardian and tell them what you think of them.....

There are so many Muslims in London that the British capital should be moved to Pakistan.These Muslims run the UK.The Brits have been castrated by these Muslims.The Guardian runs articles that are pro-Muslim and Anti-Zionist anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli...The Guardian is a trashy nasty racist filthy rag..........

If you feel that the Guardian is wrong on saying that Tel-Aviv and not Jerusalem is the capital of Israel then log on to the Guardian web site and tell them how you feel.....Good Luck...................

The Guardian is well known for it's hatred for Israel.It's no wonder that people who hate Israel flock to the Guardian site.It's an absolute disgrace that the British authorities would allow the Guardian to publish this kind of rubbish.

I seriously doubt she will

I guess it could be argued that it's correct since Britain, along with everyone else in the world, doesn't recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. BUT, since it de facto works as the capital it's just childish to issue such a "correction", weather we like it or not has nothing to do with it really, it still is the israeli capital.

Last time I was in Jerusalem, the capital of Israel, the Knesset was located on a site that is not controversial. Its location is well within the recognized area, recognized borders of The State of Israel in an undisputed part of Jerusalem. Neither The Guardian, nor the governments of the Great Britain, or even the U.S. have any say as to whether or where The State of Israel chooses to locate its seat of government. They have no right to decide this. Only the government of Israel can decide. The U.S. Congress has passed a law. There is no national security threat. It’s time to enforce U.S. law.

The Guardian can bask in the heap of Muslim crap its staff seems to enjoy so much. Sorry Brits - you lost Palestine, you lost all your former colonies and you are left with a pathetic scrotum of god-forsaken islands and "protectorates". Heck, you can't "protectorate" yourself of the Muslim crap you've been covering yourself up with ever since the US saved you from a Nazi invasion. Befitting outcome for a nation of pirates and invaders.

The posts here only go to provide evidence that the average Israeli is more sensitive than your typical football hooligan. I'm certain the average Briton couldn't care less about whatever Israelis think.

......an IP address is easily determined. Most posters who claim to be someone else, if they have half a brain, will use one the the many IP masking facilities available.

They can also declare that the Earth is flat, that the Sun is blue and that Elvis lives. It's the freedom of speech---and the freedom to be stupid.

The posts here says nothing about the average israeli since hardly anyone here is actually israeli, almost all are american jews who haven't bothered to learn hebrew. The israelis are all at the hebrew version of this site :)

Nobody said it was easy to determine the IP adress, however, the authorities can do it and have done it You're naive if you think it can't be done

Well they have to print what they finance bosses in Saudi Arabia tell them to, ather ways Guardian will dispire in to the gutter.

the point is not whether an IP address can be found. its whether "the authorities" (whoever the hell that is. i think you people imagine that there is some kind of internet police) could do anything about it. im calling sarah's bluff about her oh so worrying elite legal team that is going to source all of this info and bring an international case against someone for using the same unsecured username as her for identity theft. it is absurd and she is an idiot for thinking she can do anything about it! also; the point you think youre responding to makes a perfectly valid point. an ip masking service, or a proxy server means that even if "the authorities" (haha, i laugh at that every time) even if they manage to get an IP address (which is extremely simple to do), it will be a false one - thus, making the information useless ynet has not published two of my responses on this page before this. i will be surprised if they put this one up. i dont think they like their clique of talkbackers getting an education.

but there really has such "police" that works quite well. "Sarah B" case cannot be defined as serious cyber crime (identity theft), because 1) we (talkbackers) are not public persons, 2) no financial loss, 3) no theft of personal passport data, etc. No crime, just lost time, however very very unpleasant

im in no way surprised. and no, there is simply a section in any domestic police force that can investigate cybercrime. not an "internet police" that will look after the entire web. every point you made is correct, but its not me you need to tell, I know it. Our in house superinternetlawyer Sarah B. needs the lesson. and it's hardly unpleasant. everyone knows now that it wasnt her and anyway; its just the internet. anybody who really takes what they read seriously, particularly on ynet talkbacks, needs to reassess their life priorities. anyway, i do hope sarah keeps us up to date regarding her battle against the internet.