To the question about what the USA should do in helping after a strike by Israel on Iran he gave his reasons for not being explicit and then said about his wife & Obama's intentions: "But I generally have confidence with what they said and how they tried to explain it to the American people." He did not say "I have TOTAL confidence..." He said GENERALLY. Does that translate in diplomatic/political terms into a mediocre confidence? If so, it could possibly mean that Obama's stated refusal to accept the policy of containment of a nuclear Iran is not solid.

I've never been a fan of Bill Clinton, but the guy is sane. He's not an irrational America destroyer, as Obama is. Clinton is not a betrayer of American allies, as Obama is. Clinton is not a kisser of enemy boots, as Obama is. Clinton is sane. Obama is dangerous.

the real issue is a practical one. the USA are misreading totally what happen in our region. it's too risky for us in israel. when push come's to shove' israel will strike!! make no mistake about it. our common interest stop's right here!! we are not going to ripit history and allow the scarifies of 6 milions brothers and sisters in exchange for allowing maximum efficiency to the war mechin of the USA and it's allays .