News  World News
Gates: Strike on Iran to have catastrophic results
Yitzhak Benhorin
Published: 04.10.12, 20:55
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
55 Talkbacks for this article
1. Everyone's worried when Iran might be attacked...
YairJ   (10.04.12)
How worried are they about Iran attacking Israel as we speak?
2. Gates
Merced Dave ,   Merced, USA   (10.04.12)
More evidence that the US will never attack Iran.
3. School Chnancellor Gates is a very smart man he is no
r ,   Atlanta   (10.04.12)
There are creative ways to keep the prgram from developing after a hit.....and yes there is nothing easy about it since HE delayed the hit for too many years...if he had his way the Syrians would have a nuke program and be threatening her neighbors when he was Bush's guy. The Israelis took out the much smaller program in the time it takes to watch a movie.
4.  # 1..When was the last time Iran attacked anyone?
Edithann ,   USA   (10.04.12)
You chose that neighborhood and those people to live amongst...If you don't like them, then move....They should not be obligated to live according to your rules ...Get it? They were all there first... TATA
5. Israel ? US interests come first.
Nora Tel Aviv   (10.04.12)
When it comes to American life and money, the US can dispense israel`s. That`s all folks, sorry.
6. #1: No one is worried about Iran attacking
Israeli 2   (10.04.12)
Israel...............because they all know Iran is incapable of it. It is like comparing a toddler going up against Ironman.
7. I'd like to have a 10nth of what he was paid by Iranians!
tom ,   tel aviv   (10.04.12)
8. #4, Jews were there first. YOU weren't in America first.
Jake   (10.04.12)
What Indian tribe's native lands are you squatting on? And what are you going to do if they ever get the power to claim it back?
9. no wonder usa losing. wrong man for the job.
ralph   (10.04.12)
10. Gates
Les Freud ,   Toronto, Canada   (10.04.12)
The Americans had their own vital interests in mind when Roosevelt was asked to bomb the railways leading to Auschwitz. We know how that worked out for the Jews and others. Just look around the conflict zones of the world and you will see hundreds of thousands of lives lost because the Americans could not help them because they were busy protecting their own vital interests. America will let Israel go down in return for it's economic interests. Israel is on its own when it comes to protecting herself.
11. Gates
ron ,   canada   (10.04.12)
dear mr Gates America,s interests come first to you But Israels interests (survival) comes first to Israelis
12. islamic republic
ron ,   canada   (10.04.12)
the Islamic Republic is from being Persia . as for jews living in Israel, their dan proves they are Semites, meaning they come from Israel
13. Is this moron still pissing and moaning?
Noodles ,   Coney Island   (10.04.12)
You wreak nuclear havoc on the Iranians (which both the US and Israel are capable of) and they will cease and desist with their nuclear program immediately. Just ask the Japanese.
14. Gates
ron ,   Canada   (10.04.12)
dear Mr. Gates we remember the likes of you in history, like Chaimberlin 1939 and we all know what the result of your vision caused us.I recommend reading a few history books before making any more speeches
15. gates
rbockman ,   Philly, U.S.A.   (10.04.12)
gates was a good company man
16. Catastrophic results
Frozen ,   Canada   (10.04.12)
Who cares what Gates thinks. It's obvious that the Americans and Israelis have different interests. Israel needs to do what's best for her. Also, how are sanctions any different on future deterrents. Once we physically destroy Iran's nuclear facilities, which is totally doable, we can then continue to apply sanctions re: any future Iranian nuclear intentions.
17. Cowardly leadership!!!
Jusanz77 ,   Vzla.   (10.05.12)
Poor people of the United States, that kind of cowardly leadership has had over the last four years. If Obama is reelected goodbye United States as a world power. The closer to the atomic bomb Iran. Greater the risk of a tragedy for the people of Iran.
18. Gate's nonsense
DEB ,   Wash DC   (10.04.12)
Bill Gates is ignorant of Israel's capabilities and Iran's weaknesses. Iran's weapons aspirations can be done away with either using conventional or unconventional means. However the longer the wait the more complicated it becomes. Iran's threats to wipe Israel off the map is an act of war. Israel to respond?
19. Obviously
Brad Arnold ,   Mpls, MN, USA   (10.04.12)
I expect the same people who have the poor judgement to think a preventative attack on Iran is a good idea, will want shoot the messenger (i.e. Gates).
20. Reading eatitass's #4 comment and
Jerome ,   Basalt,Colorado   (10.05.12)
Reading the comments from the canucks. The Canadians win the debate hands down! Eatitann is obviously imbalanced!
21. dear mr gates...
tom ,   toronto, canada   (10.05.12)
dear mr gates, a nuclear-armed enemy presents an existential threat to the state of israel. in a country that is no bigger than the king ranch in texas, 10 miles wide just outside tel aviv, there is no such thing as a survivable nuclear war. this is not "anxiety", but survival. and if that survival harms "american vital interests", tough luck. maybe it's time for you to rethink america's insane policy of appeasing the very same people who cheered when the world trade center fell.
22. Mr Gates' understanding.
Gabe ,   Canada   (10.05.12)
Mr Gates can keep his blank check. His opinion is no use to anyone.
23. Israel
Blog ,   Australia   (10.05.12)
Israel has completely lost international support. Iran has never threatened us. Israel should start building bridges because we're not fighting your wars anymore.
24. I hate that argument...
NC ,   Montreal, Canada   (10.05.12)
..."Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons now, but if Israel attacks them then they'll REALLY try to build nuclear weapons." Such BS.
25. He's right
Benro   (10.05.12)
The modern ideal of pursuing targeted warfare without killing populations doesn't work and is dangerous. To destroy the Iranian threat, Iranians themselves must be destroyed. Not rocket science (pun intended) but today's "leaders" have their collective heads way too far up their collective arxses to get it.
26. Iran attacking Israel?
(10.05.12)
I believe you are being naive. I think you should do some more homework on this issue. I think you should think more before you speak. Obviously you have not been presented with all the facts, and I can't blame you for that. In my opinion, there is much more reason to conclude that the only people who will be doing the attacking is either Israel or the US. I think the logic you are using has already cost America its credibility; it's quite embarrassing.
27. An attack would make Iran nukes inevitable?
Sam ,   Texas   (10.05.12)
What about a non attack? It would stop Iranian nukes? Let's talk some more? With crazies ushering in the Mahdi and 12th Imam? Gates means head up ass in Swahili
28. #4 Gates
steve ,   chicago   (10.05.12)
Edithann, which rock do you live under? There is enormous evidence that Iranian-armed surrogates have killed hundreds of American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Today's Iran is attacking many countries and killing thousands.
29. The Gates surrender policy
Syd Chaden ,   Palermo Calif USA   (10.05.12)
According to Gates, it is best to do nothing to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and using them to destroy Israel, because if Iran is attacked, they might become angry and attack Israel with their nuclear weapons. Brilliant policy, unless you care if Israel survives, which Gates, and those who think like him, obviously do not.
30. propaganda
rm ,   Amsterdam NL   (10.05.12)
I am afraid that Israel is starting to believe it's own propaganda. Look while a nuclear Iran may be a threat to Israel, Israel has a set of nukes of it's own...so that's quite a powerful deterrence. What this war is about most of all is Israeli desire to stay the only nuclear power in the region. Now even some Israeli anylists have concluded that at best the Iranian program can be delayed. But it will make Iran an even more inplacable enemy and no one knows what consequenses that will have. You may hate Gates and despise Obama but you'd do well to head their advice.
Next talkbacks
Back to article