News
US: Resolution did not create Palestinian state
Attila Somfalvi
Published: 30.11.12, 01:21
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
36 Talkbacks for this article
31. To: No. 19
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (12.01.12)
That's a two-way street, dear. I believe you will find that a sovereign state defending its borders and its civilian population against acts of terror does not qualify as a war crime. On the other hand -- terrorism is a war crime. There's a lot that Israel can bring before the ICC for which the ersatz "Palestinians" will be held accountable.
32. To: Judge Haddad at No. 25
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (12.01.12)
If only, if only, if only. The Arabs made a mistake. But certain bad decisions are forever. You cannot put toothpaste back into the tube, Judge, and you cannot go back to 1947. There will never be a "Palestine," and the ersatz "Palestinians" have only themselves to blame.
33. 28 ,...
split ,   US   (12.01.12)
Afraid or not it doesn't change a damn thing ,...
34. Israel must demonstrate its statements in fact
bernard ross   (12.01.12)
In order not to appear to be blowhards, Israel must show that its statements are true. If the vote in the UN is an obstacle to peace then refuse to conduct further peace negotiations, or be seen as BS. Start settling those jews and annex west bank. Deport plo, fatah, pa due to breach of oslo.
35. #13- the Arabs already are - since 1917
William ,   Israel   (12.03.12)
36. #15 - the US' reasons are sound
William ,   Israel   (12.03.12)
Why vote for unilateral recognition when peace is only achieved when both parties negotiate it? Your failure here is looking at the majority of States that voted in favor, but with conditions which included peaceful coexistence and negotiation to a final State. So, Rice's comments are not so inaccurate after all in that context.
Previous talkbacks
Back to article