Opinion
Biblical claim to the land?
David Ha'ivri
Published: 26.12.12, 11:15
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
96 Talkbacks for this article
91. Reply to 63 Occupation?
Sherlock Holmes ,   London England   (12.30.12)
As you know only two countries in the world recognised Jordan's claim to the West Bank -- the UK and Pakistan. Jordan took over East Jerusalem and the West Bank by driving out the Jews who lived there. If Jordan had no claim to the West Bank and the Mandate had ended, no country aside from Israel had much of a claim. Let's face it Jerusalem, Hebron et al had been Jewish for at least 3,000 years, and there was no such country as Palestine.
92. To No. 89
Bertram ,   London, UK   (12.30.12)
All historical evidence, whether derived from documents or found objects, is partial and subject to interpretation and reinterpretation. History is not laboratory science. Consequently, histories are constantly re-written over time. The Bible is not a single document and has different meanings in different traditions. Thus, a Jewish - Zionist - reading might emphasise the historicity of the Bible, while ignoring those aspects which may be historically problematic. No problem with that, but do not expect everyone else to subscribe to the same interpretations.
93. let's not forget the tunnel.
SD Charger ,   San Diego   (12.30.12)
Hezekiah's tunnel that is. Right where the BIBLE said it would be, no? It's construction, architecture and purpose still speaks today, like it or not. The Israeli flag will ALWAYS fly over Jerusalem-Forever !!!
94. To Sherlock #91 Samaria hadnĀ“t been...
Alex   (12.30.12)
..."Jewish" for 3000 years. It had been "Samaritan" from parcelling the land unto Ephraim and Manasseh (according to themselves) and alternatively from the time of the Babylonian exile (according to others) until now... Elementary, my dear Watson!
95. Hezekiah's Tunnel
ltrail ,   United States   (12.31.12)
Yes, it is just as the TNCH said. I've walked through it myself.
96. S.California
valeri ,   South Afrrica   (01.01.13)
Steven. 1.I met a lot of educated Mexican who told me that "american stole S.California from Mexica" Why USA does not returne land to them. 2.State land not a purst which can be stollen. Wars and Peace Treaties give land to state. 3. Arabs started aggressive wars and paid price for these wars( as Germany,Japan...and may be Mexica still paid prices by lands for lost aggresive wars.
Previous talkbacks
Back to article