1. You only wish that the "Palestinians" destroy themselves the way Israel is "destroying itself". 2. 65 years is nothing in history. Although at least you recognize they have been there for a very short time. ("recognized right" is wishful thinking on your part. As long as their stated wish is to destroy Israel, they have no rights.) 3. Shows you how much those countries think of "Palestinians", especially after they tried to take over Jordan. 4. They have had plenty of choices and still do. They chose to believe the arab generals, and left their homes to make the 'conquest' easier. They choose to kill Jews, and to teach their children the same. They choose not to move on and make a living somewhere else in the world. They choose to live under the fake moniker "Palestinian" which they discovered in the 1960's (less than 65 years ago.)

So why should the Pals?

If not a 2 state solution than what? We haven’t annexed the territories because we do not want to give Israeli citizenship to the Arab residents. Instead we have kept them "bottled up like cockaroaches" for over 50 years. The bottle is cracked and about to shatter. If not a 2 state solution then what? Ethnic cleansing? Apartheid? The rejection of the TSS without offering a viable alternative reduces your article to a rehash of emotive nonsensical knee jerk nonsequiteurs without merit or meaning. Go back to your crayons Mr. Rosenfeld. Chaim et seq; we have at least to try the TSS before we can claim that the territories are necessary for our surivial.

Chaim, how to make all Israelis understand this??

Even if the Jews take half of Judae and Samaria for 5000square Kilometres of Islamic Israel Many Megacities for Arabs who have the Capacity to Live I peace with their Jewish neighbours can be built.BrainWashing and War Talk to an extent by Both Jew and Arab meanthe Long Truce .