News
Bennett: Palestinian State would lead to terrorism
The Media Line
Published: 17.02.14, 21:44
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
12 Talkbacks for this article
1. But Israel would be the good guy
Dan   (02.17.14)
Yes, a Pal state would probably mean terror and even war. But Israel would be in the right and the good guy, able to defeat and shame the Pals into making peace as they are doing to us now. The world would support Israel not the Pals, the moral lines would be clear and Israel's legitimacy would not be in question.
2. ONLY MK who cares more about his life than money = BENNETT
Odaya ,   Jerusalem   (02.17.14)
He already has enough. Everyone else let's their hopes of FALSE "PROSPERITY" completely shut down their rational brains when it comes to the dangers of a PA state. Thank you Naftali...!!!!
3. The world gets it wrong
Jez ,   Netanya   (02.17.14)
Of course Bennett doesnt get it wrong ever!! Nor do his Judean and Samarian constituents. I wonder if his wife agrees? What an arrogant man! a bit like the late Hugo Chavez - a rabble rouser
4. The reason Mr Bennett gets it right
rinah   (02.18.14)
He understands the Creator's order: to please Him above pleasing man. The order: Creator, covenant partner, children, family, friends, colleagues. No room for perversion.
5. Many Arabs are Semites
Zus   (02.18.14)
Kerry is a Philosemite
6. And No Palestine leads to Apartheid, Sanctions
Lynx ,   Palestine   (02.18.14)
7. #1 I wish you were right
Isac   (02.18.14)
but if you would have read the entire article you would have been able to understand that any nice gestures from the Israelis towards the Palestinians had been interpreted as being weak. And what happened to Gaza? Israel vacated entirely Gaza. When Hamas in Gaza attacked Israel through thousands of missiles and Israel intervened militarily, the entire world was in arms up. How could you (defend yourself)? So, your dream will not become reality. No chance whatsoever!
8. Bennet is not better than Lieberman
Reuven ,   Netanya   (02.18.14)
Using wrong numbers/facts, spreading fear and hate whenever he can. According to shabak, since 2004, there has been 267 casualties related to Palestinian terror ... according to B. thousands ... would that be a wish of him?
9. #1 with all due respect
(02.18.14)
What you say sounds very wise, but has been proven completely wrong countless times. When Israel still controlled Gush Katif, Leftist icon Ran Cohen played the tough guy. He said once we retreat, if the Arabs so much as shoot one rocket we would bomb them with world support. You know how that ended. Or look at what happened when Olmert's extreme Left government. After Gush Katif and Amona, after publically announcing he would accept all Fatah demands including ethnic cleansing of Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem and accepting 60000 Arab immigrants, all Olmert wanted to do is defend Israel after the Shalit kidnapping and Hezbollah's attack. Not only did no one support Olmert, they even sent Goldstone to call him a war criminal. With all due respect, you are wrong.
10. To: No. 1
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.18.14)
And how many Israelis should die in order to prove your point?
11. To: No. 6
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (02.18.14)
Are you threatening the State of Israel with increased terrorist attacks? Do you remember the first and second intifadas? Don't you realize we'll squash you like the cockroaches you are?
12. Exit from WB
Mark ,   London, UK   (02.18.14)
Is just as likely to lead to terror in the Palestinian territories as the gangsters fight over the spoils of war. Having said that, it would be their problem so long as the bombs don't drop over the border.
Back to article