News  Mideast News
Iran rejects limited international access to military sites
Reuters
Published: 05.06.15, 21:15
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
6 Talkbacks for this article
1. Regardless
Norm L Jew ,   Galut   (06.05.15)
Regardless of the Iranian refusal, the western powers, led by Obama, will sign off on a deal and simultaneously make irrational and maniacal demands of Israel to surrender its defenses in the name of "world peace." There is no need to engage in mindless and endless rhetoric about the other possibilities, as this is inevitable---and was always predictable! Sadly, we Jews, from Bibi to the man in the street, still believe more in the White House than Heaven, and that is a road to disaster!
2. Iran admits that weaponisation will continue
CJK   (06.05.15)
the shia terror regime carries out nuclear weaponisation at its military sites. a nuclear weapons program has three main components: 1 enrichment of uranium. iran has upped uranium enrichment in the last months during negotiations with P5+1; 2 weaponisation. weaponisation is the process of turning enriched uranium into a bomb. weaponisation is the process by which nuclear bombs are miniaturised so as to fit on missiles. iran conducts weaponisation at its military sites. iran has steadfastly refused to give the iaea any information about its weaponisation of uranium, in the past and in the present. 3 ballistic missiles. ballistic missiles are the delivery machanism for nuclear bombs. iran has an advanced ballistic missile program. iran's ballistic missiles have sufficient range to hit western europe. conclusion: iran continues all aspects of its nuclear weapons program while negotiating in bad faith with world powers.
3. Iran shoudl ask the USA for total access to all USA military
spyguy ,   seattle usa   (06.06.15)
bases. NONE of the P5+1, especially the USA, will allow any access to their military bases. Asking Iran to do something no other nation on earth would agree to is ridiculous. The IAEA and USA CIA nuclear detection instruments have NOT detected any nuclear activity at the Iranian military bases, so there is zero justification to enter any Iranian base. If the USA thinks that bases should be open, then the USA should open all its bases first.
4. Iran needs to let full access!
Jon ,   Boston, MA   (06.05.15)
Iran can not be trusted! Full access to military sites or just nuke them back to the stone age is how I feel!! Israel will take care of them!
5. Iran nuclear inspection
Maurice M Margulies ,   Rockville MD USA   (06.05.15)
If there is not free inspection of Iranian sites there should be no accord. Iran has gotten as far as it has because it withdrew UN inspection access some years ago. Up sanctions and keep military option open unless free access is included.
6. #5 - Totally wrong on all points
spyguy ,   seattle usa   (06.06.15)
(1) ALL, repeat ALL, of Iran's nuclear sites are fully inspected 24/7/365 by the IAEA and all nuclear material in Iran is strictly accounted for.The nuclear inspections have NOT stopped. (2) the USA wants to spy on non-nuclear sites, which NO nation on earth allows, especially the USA. There is no basis for inspecting non-nuclear sites, especially when IAEA and CIA instruments show there is no nuclear material on the sites.(3) The other nations on earth will not allow any expansion of sanctions and in fact most of the third-party (non-USA) sanctions will stop by the end of 2015. (4) Also by the end of 2015, any nation that wants to trade with Iran can do so via the Chinese trade bank which will hide the transaction from the USA. (5) both the IDf and the US military have told the political leaders that no attack is possible, especially with Iran's very advanced multi-layer air defense systems. Any attack on Iran would be suicidal.
Back to article