6. About ambassador´s indication to Brazil
Sergio Niskier , |
Brazil |
|
(01.06.16) |
it is unbelievable what is going on in this case. The former ambassador Reda Mansour was great, and served to the same government that indicated Dany Dayan to replace him. The diplomatic instructions certainly would not be different. The orders certainly would not be different because Israel changed ambassador. Brazil usually has opposite positions to Israel, and this is not motive to call back ambassadors, to create a diplomatic problem. The ties with Brazil improve and the commercial balance is favorable to Brazil in almost 1 billion dollars. even with a lot of difficulties, Israel never brought problems to the ties between the 2 countries. No ambassador is ambassador of his own ideas. He represents the country. And follow the diplomatic instructions and rules from the international conventions. The true is that the Brazilian government, once more decided to make internal politic, with a case, that could be solved very easily. The first complain was that Israel announced priorly the approval, the name of Dayan. This could be corrected with a simple letter of excuses. But the real reasons are really bad. They decided that there is 2 kinds of israelis. One kind that they like, and other they don´t. It is a shame for me, as a brazilian citizen, to see this kind of things. Brazil now says that the reason is that Dayan represents the settlers, that Brazil don´t agree. But we see that Brazil has ties with many countries, that has political decisions, not from the ambassador, but from the country, as dictators, as prejudices against homosexuals, woman, black people, countries that use dead sentences, countries that use chemical weapons against their own people, and countries that threats others to destruction and a lot of other issues. The worries with the brazilian feelings about political situations came to the relationship with other countries only with Israel.
|