News
Netanyahu slams Gaza disengagement during Sharon memorial
Moran Azulay
Published: 29.02.16, 21:30
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
5 Talkbacks for this article
1. Sharon and Herzog
Jake ,   Jerusalem   (02.29.16)
I actually loved Sharon, but the pull out in Gaza was down right stupid. Worse than that, it is almost impossible to believe that Herzog praises the pullout and calls to continue on Sharon's path. This is totally stupidity after Gaza went from being a place of beauty and peace to a terror center. Sharon might have made one mistake, but Herzog seems totally nonsensical.
2. good thing PM Mr. Sharon was there 2 clean up
Jew-C ,   JewLandia (Israel)   (02.29.16)
up Prime Minister Mr. Netanyahu's mess. After all it was Prime Minister Mr. Sharon who ordered the successful target killing of Ahmad Yassin. You remember Yassin the incarcerated head of Hamas who Prime Minister Mr. Netanyahu released and with him released the worst every wave of terrorism that Israel has ever known. What? Prime Minister Mr. Netanyahu forgot about this? A pity...
3. Hypocrite! Netanyahu voted FOR the expulsion
Dina Moskowitz   (03.01.16)
in the Knesset when the time came to vote! He changed his mind only after it was already too late! Nothing Netanyahu says now can ever make up for that!
4. Hindsight is 20/20 Vision
MadDad ,   Johannesburg RSA   (03.01.16)
No points for NOW saying the Gaza pullout led to rockets and terror. Thinking that the pull-out was a great achievement can only come from an idiot
5. Gaza disengagement
c   (03.01.16)
after the horrific terror attacks in ny, sharon made a public statement that israel will not be the new czechoslovakia. sharon was forced to agree to the disengagement because bush and others panicked and thought that appeasing the arabs would prevent further attacks. the idea that israel is the cause of muslim terror attacks is simply muslim propaganda. there should never be a unilateral disengagement without a written international agreement that spells out the rights and obligations of each side.
Back to article