what's the fuss? the comments make the problem clear. Generals often unhappy with each other, let alone with their political overlords. if they couldnt handle it, theyd not have been made generals. seems to me lieberman's simply? trying to calm down general feeling the politicians and the generals 'rushed to public judgment' about something that should have been left to the IDF's quite competent internal legal system to handle. Generals also have the duty to disagree with policies the ministers propose for the army. So what?