As to "citizens of China and NZ"-nobody has asked them,their politicos do whatever's easier,bashing Israel-and you participate at it

There is a majority of Israelis for peace. They don't need convincing. The majority of Palestinians don't want peace if it leaves a Jewish state. This has always been the case and it hasn't changed.

Jews want Peace but don't need it.

Arabs need Peace but don't want it

Peace will come when Arabs decide to want what they sorely need.

This is the only realistic moral equivalency in this conflict and it applies to all other conflicts in the Middle East.

to form such opinions?
What "two camps" in the murderous, devious and fanatic Arab/Muslim population ? This is insanity unchecked and running rampant in broad daylight. What's more frightening: there're still some politicians believing they can eke out a career claiming "Two State Solution".

The author seems to be implying that if Israel had made peace with the Pals Turkey & Berlin would not have been attacked and Israel is the cause of global terror which is nonsense. It also takes 2 to make peace and the Pals have never taken peace seriously not under Rabin, Peres, Barak, Sharon, Olmert or Netanyahu. Suha Arafat admitted that the intifada was planned. Abbas has like Arafat made alot of demands and offered very little in return and since Obama came to office he has got even worse. In his first term Obama was on his side and pressuring Israel to make concessions and when Israel did make a concession to jump start things Abbas turned round told Obama not enough so I am not talking. When Netanyahu offered a 1 month settlement freeze Abbas said not enough refused to talk and when the freeze ended he said settlements are the reason he won't talk. Fact is Abbas wants an imposed solution because a negotitaed one means he also has to male concessions which he doesn't want to do. There is no black and white solution to this conflict.

Even the last Abbas' statement concerning an eventual US Embassy transfer to Jerusalem, will not convince a perturbed Haber that the so called Israeli-"Palestinian" conflict is not nationalistic neither territorial, but essentially religious. Hatred and violence in Islam didn't start with the existence of the state of Israel, neither with the colonial period or the Crusaders. It started already in the first Sourat of the Koran, Fatyha, with the hatred of Jews and Christians. But this is “treiffe” substance for Haber’s unconditional loyalty to “political correctness”!

And that phrase is "two rival camps." This is a media twist and not the Peppermint Twist. One cannot actually put Israel into a so called rival camp. For instance in just one thing: Israel will save a so called palestinian life if that so called palestinian is injured. Reverse that role and what do we then have? We have a savage rabid animal who will kill man woman or children and with what purpose? To ultimately destroy the nation of Israel. And then we have the media, the UN, the world talking about a "two state solution?"

In order for there to be an occupation, one nation needs to be occupying land belonging to another nation. So what land belonging to what nation does anyone think Israel is occupying?

Israel need merely end the lunatic flow of Israeli food, money, electricity, work permits etc. to evil fictional 'Palestine", and it is toast within weeks. Many "Palestinians" would gladly sell their land to Jews and leave for other countries, but the terrorist P.A. stops them through murder. Once "Palestine" falls, Jews will easily be able to purchase our land. Let evil fictional "Palestine" fall and we will have peace.

They mistakenly think they can call Israel 'palsetine.' Aint happening now or ever!

He states clearly the difference between the religious Jew
and the Hellenistic Jew one loves and treasures Jerusalem
the other sees no importance whatsoever to it