look back-israelis gave with oslo, withdrew from various towns, then bibi withdrew from mo st of hebron, then sharon withdrew from gaza and parts of samaria, what did israel get? terror x 100, more incitement, more eu and usa demands. what are you stupid? Next came sholmert offering right of return he says symbolically but not, a link across israel between gaza and west bank to be plo land most of west bank and east jerusalem and abbas refused? You cannnot read the tea leaves? There will be no peace period unless you leave tel aviv. there is no convincing arabs otherwise.

israel has to consider the jordanian option, annex area c for starters.

bibi doesn't have the guts to do it. he is weak but lapid is worse. he is another olmert. he knows like livni nothing of security. he now wants gantz, a passive geneeral to be his expert. lapid was one of the keys along wiht livni in voting not to take out tunnels and race to a ceasefire before furthur provocations forced israel.

the world could give 2 ccents about israel. on the other hand, israeis cannmnot keep voting for weak leaderss like lapid herzog and livnni who will give the store away and make israel's situation worse.

israelis bear lots of blame for not correcting the subservience trait in them. they say we need a change so we'll vote for lapid. yes, you need a change, but vote for bennett or feiglin, decisive leaders or vote for saar or barkat if they eneter the race..

lapid is olmert like who will bring more terror to israel, many times more and more european demands. his deputy peri is a walking disaster in security. most of his yesh atid members are like haaretz journalists who detest israelis fighting back and asserting national claims.

lapid is a nightmaare in security. i will not vote for him under any circumstances. bibi is weak, but lapid is worse. he doesn't know what he is doing.