Such a fool always going off half-cocked!

It wasn't a Muslim ban. A Muslim ban would've included all Muslims from all Muslim countries. It was a temporary halt to some Muslims from seven Muslim terrorist countries, in order to actually do some vetting for a change. The courts ruled against President Trump's exec. order simply because they didn't like it. There was no legal or constitutional reason to rule against it. Besides, the courts don't have that power, so Trump really should dismiss the ruling and enforce his order. Ynet and Reuters may not like Trump's exec. order, but they should at least be accurate about it and stop calling it a Muslim ban, because it wasn't. It should've been, but it wasn't.