|
I see nothing but positives from this move ......... Hamas retains military control of Gaza while the civilian rule goes to someone else ........ the PA, Hezbollah, Turkey, or perhaps Sweden. It is quite a splendid idea.
|
|
|
2. what is the difference now
was there a difference between the sa and the ss. yes, there was. the ss murdered the sa leadership and then the rank aand file of the sa was gobbled by the ss. that is how dictatorships are created. not that hamas ever allowed even a semblance of democracy in the territory of gaza. let them play. the result will be the slaughter of many beautiful little girls and boys who would have a wonderful life if only they could live in a country where children are loved.
|
|
|
3. Is it a coincidence?
Sammy , |
Newcastle |
|
(08.11.17) |
That following Hamas reported plan for universal male conscription from 18-60 the majority of Gazans would refuse point blank any call up
However with Military Rule no one can reject call up at the risk of imprisonment or capital punishment
It would also enable Hamas to divert 'all available resources' (that are left after they have lined their pockets) to military as opposed to civilian purposes
Dictatorship is too kind a word...This is modern day Hamas ENSLAVEMENT of Gaza
|
|
|
4. Tfadal ya Hams. Ya ayouni habibi kul kalb Arabushes
Steve Benassi , |
Minneapolis USA |
|
(08.12.17) |
| |