The head of the legal department of Thyssenkrupp says here that Ganor's commission was reasonable given the long time involved. He also confirms that Shimron came to Thyssenkrupp's offices to help Ganor formulate the terms of his commission. In other words, Shimron provided normal services of a lawyer to a client, for which he deserved and earned a payment in proportion to the benefit to that client, so what grounds are there for seeing a crime? More perplexing is why Ganor claims to have committed a crime and is accusing a string of others of being accomplices, all of whom deny it. Is this a fantasist?

it is known that shimron and netanyahu are cousins. are they supposed
to cut their familial ties?