Gaza was Egyptian and the West Bank was Jordanian.The so called Palestinians know perfectly well what would have happened if they had sort independence from Egypt and Jordan and equally during Turkish rule before that,and funnily enough they never spoke of it. Hiding under the European snowflakes who shout when one Gazan is harmed but I don't hear any noise regarding deaths and injuries on the Israeli side. Always the Gazans start the mess and when it gets bad use the "poor old people and women and children of Gaza.The people of Gaza appear to love living under appauling conditions and the news would be if in the future the people got a backbone,woke up and threw out these terrorists but of course that will never happen.Like Iraq etc someone else has to go in and do the dirty work for them and even then in the end they will never he satisfied.Much easier to play the victim and live off UN handouts.
4. "hit mid-level targets..." is this any way to win a war?
as for 'no injuries in attacks on weapons caches'- I don't care if there are injuries or deaths to people hiding weapons. These weapons will be used to kill IDF soldiers when they enter Gaza.
As for 'midlevel targets,' who gave that order? What idiot is protecting the likes of Haniyeh and ilk, who should have been killed years ago?
An Israeli, far from the border, is dead. Murdered by a random rocket launched by an evil Islamist government in Gaza.
That should tell everyone exactly what Israel needs to do.
No IDF need enter that sh-t-hole. Let the IAF and artillery do the work. Every known Hamas and IJ target must be destroyed, along with as many Hamas and IJ soldiers as possible. Hamas's basement HQ under that hospital must be destroyed.
bennett and feiglin offered more decisive operations in gaza. instead you voted for bibi who is not an attacking soldier or gantz who was passive during the previous gaza war.
bennett had some plans. feiglin likewise. instead you get katz who says we do not want a war and bibi who says hit them hard. this is not a plan period. how about retaking Philadelphia and rocketing hamas from the rear etc etc.
gantz says restore deterrence. if his past actions are anything to go on, he is the same like bibi-all talk no action.
idf typically is soft until they shake off the rust and get going. since olmert, then bibi and barak, they have not let the idf shake off the rust. worse, they themselves save barak do not understand the battlefield period.and barak hit empty sand dunes, he was next to useless.
even though hamas is losing more assets, the perception is of Jews running and wailing while hamas remains resolute.
bibi should have nothing to do with security.he is a flop at security.
in any case, you rejected bennett so this is what you get.