I found what I posted on JPost FAQ for Aliah.

1) Sykes-Picot, unfortunately, is not PUBLIC agreement so it does not need official implementation. It was secret agreement. It WAS implemented, since partitions and influential zones follow these lines. 2) If you read ALL my posts here you will see that I acknowledge there were no "Palestinians" in 1947. But I also stated that you should have prevented their creation as a nation (through Syria's recognition, Jordan's recognition and subsequent relinquish of territories that will "become new state of Palestine"). Btw, your English is fabulous: " It has never been Palestinian land ever and it is cannot be Israel's..." "I see you learnt" (have learned, btw, not just learnt). I try to response in civilized fashion to a bunch of racist people who do not think for themselves they are racist just because they are Jews. And in speed and desire to make good arguments, I make grammatical mistakes. What's your excuse. Oh, to all slanders - SORRY I do not think like you do and do not think that Israel should be till Tokio.

Very true and fair claim for an even handed approach, which should be expected from a self proclaimed mediator

Brad you should not correct other people's written English until you first acquire the skills to express yourself in that language. You ignore facts; this demonstrates that pure Judeophobia motivates your diatribe. You display all the reasoning skills of an oligophrenic. The points and arguments that you attempt to sell, as facts, are mendacious. Brad you must be an amusing jester at dinner parties, although once you have been invited to somebody’s house I doubt you would be invited back: "Pass the cauliflower, Jews 'rant rant'. Can I have some cabbage? Jews 'rant rant'. Nice meal, Jews 'rant rant'. Can I have some peas? Jews 'rant rant'." I must thank you on behalf of the commentators here; you are incredibly funny. Although I doubt this was your earnest intent. Joker.

Yes EAST of the Jordan is vague, but that does include Judea and Samaria at the LEAST. "HOME of the Jewish people" - Israel a Jewish State. Guess they couldn't be the same. Guess again. "Turkish Empire" - Never heard of it, must have been you thesis too. ARTICLE 25. In the territories lying between the Jordan and the eastern boundary of Palestine as ultimately determined, the Mandatory shall be entitled, with the consent of the Council of the League of Nations, to postpone or withhold application of such provisions of this mandate as he may consider inapplicable to the existing local conditions, and to make such provision for the administration of the territories as he may consider suitable to those conditions, provided that no action shall be taken which is inconsistent with the provisions of Articles 15, 16 and 18. Yes those are 3 separate laws, written 25 years apart. So you are disputing the actual wording of international law. Now where is that INTERNATIONAL LAW that you claimed? You still haven't managed to show a single legal ARAB claim. If there is one then it is disputed, otherwise it belongs to us. Who the heck is Boris Shusteff? Never heard of him.

I also think that you are a clown and a jerk, but that doesn't, unlike you, stop me to be civilized. So you have any arguments or no? Or do you want to slander, protected by censors, simply because you are a Jew and can do to others whatever you want (and censors will let through your slander, but will not let through mine - happened about 3 times just yesterday).

You write: “I also think that you are a clown and a jerk, but that doesn't, unlike you, stop me to be civilized [sic]” The correct English phrasing is written as follows: …stop me being civilized. You write: “So you have any arguments or no?” It is written as follows: …so do you have any arguments or not. I demolished your arguments above, as did several other people. Nothing that you posted stands up to scrutiny. In fact you have been humiliated here. You are a laughing stock. You write: “Or do you want to slander” Slander is an oral and intentionally untrue statement about a person; everything here is written. Again you use incorrect English. I think the word you are looking for is libel. However I have not libelled you. I merely pointed out that you are a funny, inconsequential, Judeophobic joke. Did I mention you sound sub-human? That is an insult not libel. You state that I am: “protected by censors” Again you are talking nonsense. This forum has rules. If you break the forum rules it is likely that you post will not be reprinted. Many people have posts that are not reproduced. Only you incorrectly presuppose that the imposition of forum rules is specifically targeted at you, in order to censor you. This demonstrates that you are paranoid. You state this false accusation of protection by censors is: “simply because you are a Jew” Wrong again! What a racist presumption!! I am not a Jew or an Israeli. I am just one of the more civilized (to borrow from your diction), human beings that can not stand the bullying racism that is directed at Jews by oligophrenics such as yourself. You complain that several of your posts are not allowed: “[it] happened about 3 times just yesterday”: May I suggest you stop trolling and return to the dark, dank hole that you slithered out from? You are repeating yourself now /yawn /roflmao. English is most certainly not your native language. Perhaps your dulcet and racist tones would be better received in Pharsi on an Iranian government sponsored website? /wave

You are racist, believe it or not... The difference is that I have problems with Jews, I state it loud, and I have it cause I had much business with them. And some things that I claim, I claim from experience. True, my native is NOT English, but one European language - but I have lived in Brooklin for 10 years. Hence my animosity... But, since we are going personal: you are a racist prick which can be shown from "Perhaps your dulcet and racist tones would be better received in Pharsi on an Iranian government sponsored website? " You immediately assumed I am Iranian. Sorry, I am not. You immediately presumed I am Arab - he, there are only Jews and Arabs on the world who have opinion on this matter. You are either a Jew or an Arab and if you are a Jew, you MUST support ALL Israeli decisions, as well if you are Arab you MUST kill all Jews. This is your mindset. So the only thing that stands is - you don't have a single argument. Roman had argument. Gee had argument. You? You are just a nerdy jerk who most probably sits behind computer 24/7 and laughs "Oh, I am so super, I supervise your English, I am so great!" The additional detail that proves me that is your "/wave" and similar "computer details". I bet you see yourself as a great savior of all Jews - now you are here on Ynet news forum and YOU are going to show these ugly antisemites how they should treat the poor Jews. You will never again allow a single antisemit to breath again till your last death or till you have to eat your Corn Flakes and go to school. Face it - you are a laugh. You are pressing and imposing a language purity on somebody who does not give a shit if he left a vowel or if his phrase is not completely English. I don't give a shit about your language purity - you still didn't write a single line about subject. I know, I would be more accepted here to you and, let's say Yaron, if I would simply state: "Kill all the Arabs, all of them, nuke everything and all will be all right!" Bet that you would not check my English then, would you? So, please, go back to the only thing that you did (for you didn't talk): can you spell check this post and repost it again? Thanks. Don't think, of course, that I will PAY you for that, spell checker?

I am the evil twin of Sacha Baron Cohen. My name is Ahcas Norab Nehoc. :/ It's been fun, but still...

You wrote: “You are racist…You immediately assumed I am Iranian” I did not presume you are Iranian. I just stated the obvious that your racism would be well received on an Iranian government website. This is because you and they are both openly racist against Jews. However due to your loss of temper you finally admit you are racist, which obliterates ALL of your arguments as bias, you state: “I have problems with Jews, I state it loud, and I have it cause I had much business with them.” Clearly you have not met all Jews; you have just met a handful of them. You are racist because you attribute things you do not like on the few you have met onto all of them that you have never met. This is the perfect example of racism. You state: “if you are Arab you MUST kill all Jews. This is your mindset.” Wrong again. Read The final quote in Article 7 of the Hamas Charter. It is the Arabs who desire to kill all Jews they say it openly, no one forces them to say this. In Post #62 against Danny you wrote: “Btw, your English is fabulous: " It has never been Palestinian land ever and it is cannot be Israel's..." "I see you learnt" (have learned, btw, not just learnt).” If you start to point at other people’s minor errors in their use of English, the plethora of huge mistakes you have made all over this forums are going to get pointed out to you. So do not cry when the same logic you apply to others is turned back on you for greater effect. That is the only reason I mention your embarrassingly bad use of English. You claim to be civilized but it is you who now stoop so low that you words like sh%t. Now everyone knows that you admitted racism against Jews because of the reasons you say, your: “business with them”. Like I said you are an oligophrenic. Thank you for admitting your racism to all of us though. It confirms what we perceived in your one-sided, bias, hateful ranting. So ultimately we realise that the rubbish you wrote about non-Jews not being able to buy property in Israel (in post #1) was just Judeophobic lies. Consider yourself flamed.

1) It wasn't me who pulled spell checking, it was you and Danny. Sorry, I responded. If you think that I should not respond in a similar way as attacked, then, buster, be consistent, write a letter to Israeli government. 2) I do not hide that I have problems with Jews - my question is HOW DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY JEWS I KNOW? What if I was orthodox Jew once who got disgusted because of various things in various Jewish communities? So called "self hating Jew", as you call it (btw, did you know that the originator of this term, "self hating ..." is GOEBBLES, who called Germans who save Jews "self hating Germans?) 2) I do not lose my temper because of a nerd somewhere on the globe. :) The fact that you IMAGINED me lose my temper adds to what I wrote about your self centering "I am savior of Jews" image. 3) Oh, I know the charter. Let me expand your knowledge: similar things you can find in FATAH charter, yes. Oh, you thought I didn't know that? Well, NEWS FLASH FOR YOU: just because someone has problems with some nation or group of people, IT DOESN'T NECESERRELY mean he doesn't have arguments! Or, dude, sorry, - half of comments here, INCLUDING YOURS, fall under "You are a Jew and Israeli, therefore you are biased towards Palestinians, therefore, f''k off with your arguments". In fact, you know what, I will continue your righteous strategy - all counter arguments will end up "Let me quote Zed The Machiah of London, Saviour of Jews: "You are biased, therefore all your arguments, no matter how logical and backed up are - void". Oh, and spell checker - this sentence is wrong: It is the Arabs who desire to kill all Jews they say it openly, no one forces them to say this. Are you getting paid for spell checking? Hopefully not...

What kind of idiot is this Brad, anyway. I was once a Baha'i, but I never came across any Baha'is with Jewish ancestory. However, I did come across a lot of them who were Iranian. Mayby he should be spending as much time worrying about the Baha'is of Iran as he seems to be about the Arabs of Israel. I can assure him that their plight is much worse than the Arabs of Israel.

The article points out that the obvious should not be taken for granted. It has been taken for granted that Jewish settlement are an obsticle to peace becasue they complicate the final borders to be drawn between the sides. But what about Arab settelements that are near Israel proper? They are as much (or more) of an obstacle as the Jewish borders