News
Brzezinski: Bold move needed to advance peace
Yitzhak Benhorin
Published: 10.04.10, 18:39
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
81 Talkbacks for this article
61. #8 Frank. Left mostly guilty for "peace process" victims.
Chaim   (04.11.10)
#8 Frank. Brezinsky may have facilitated the dangerous fraudulent "peace process" which cost Israel tens of thousands of maimed and murdered civilians. However, Brezinsky could not have inflicted it on Israel without the strong backing of the Israeli left. Remember the Oslo Disaster years? The left was so sure peace was around the corner, they arrested critics of the "peace process". Democracy was attacked to further the destruction of Israel to entice a contemptuous terrorist named Arafat to sign a worthless piece of paper. That still sums up the "peace process" today.
62. as a palestinian i ganna tell you something
moneer   (04.11.10)
when i read the palestinians news if there is something about the peace process you won't find any post not even one other news could have 50 or 100 posts we know nothing gonna happen and after all it will be one state
63. Do AMERICA a FAVOR PLEASE!
Greycoat ,   Tampa, FL   (04.11.10)
Do Israel AND AMERICA a big favor. When Air Force One is over Israel shoot it down. You can't force people into peace.
64. 444 days that drove Brzezinski to illness
george morgenstern ,   rochester ny   (04.11.10)
Carter/Brzezinski administration was damaged to no end when the Iran hostage catastrophy humiliated the US and it's President. 444 days of subjecting the USA to ridicule and impotancy is the hallmark of the Carter/Brzezinski mark in history..and this drives these guys to a mental epilapsy...naturally, Carter/Brzezinski hiccup is to blame the Jews........
65. Bzezinski has been plotting against Jews for decades
Norm ,   USA   (04.11.10)
I find it hard to believe that he actually found another president to listen to his advice. He hates Israel. He already screwed Iran...now he is back and Obama is listening !!! Heaven help us all.
66. #55 Our Belfast Friend
Notre Dame Green ,   USA   (04.11.10)
I cannot believe that an Irishman, who spent hundreds of years fighting other Irishmen because they all prayed to the same God, has the nerve to tell Jews anything !! What are you a comedy writer ? Do us a favor and go to the frig and get another beer....try drinking slowly this time.
67. #55
TRASH IN ,   BELFAST IRELAND   (04.11.10)
That's because the neighbor is a criminal thief of an Empire ranging from the Persian Gulf to the Atlantic Ocean and from the Taurus Mountains to the Horn of Africa, and still has a healthy appetite for more. You seem to forget that their 5th column Doctors infiltrated Glasgow across the straits from you to do the same to you.
68. Ziggie's solutions
Saly Barber ,   Chicago, USA   (04.11.10)
#50 is either a lunatic or threatening the USA, in any case, we should stop all support of Israel, neither a democracy nor our friend.
69. I am Christian Zionist!
jim little ,   rockport,texas usa   (04.11.10)
YES,need to speak to American Conservatives ,most are Republicans,I'm afraid the Democrats are lost,they have drank the Kool-Aid, we will slow this madness down 2010 Nov elections.obama and the Democrats right now have absolute power.Israel has to hang tough and tell obama to go to hell.Over 52% of the US! supports and loves Israel
70. 7 year peace deal.
Vincent ,   Jerusalem, Israel   (04.11.10)
Perhaps this will be the 7 year peace deal initiated by the anti-Christ, as spoken of in the book of Daniel. Rabbi Shivili in 1935 said "we Jews can know everything we need to know about our future just by reading the book of Daniel". Why is Brzezinski dictating what Obama should be doing in a country he is not president of ?? Both of these secular drones should mind their SECULAR BUSINESS. When Jerusalem is divided, all hell will break loose, "for they parted My land"=Joel 3:2. Do not dabble with God's chosen people and land.
71. To Ron#1
Al ,   Los Angeles, USA   (04.11.10)
Why dont you be realistic and get the hell out of the Palestinian territories and East Jerusalem, in the end they will not be yours, and thousands would have died for what you idiot? You go on about the Palestinians not accepting peace deals then you go on to mention that even if they, it would'nt work anyway. So what are you advocating, the enslavement of the Palestinian population until the end of time? If you want the Palestinians to give up the right of return or to recognize Israel as a Jewish state why not offer predominately Arab villages close to the green line and uninhabited land as a trade off? And for all you idiots who claim Israel always has to make gestures, consider the fact that the PLO has basically given Israel the greatest gesture ever in giving up lands conquered after the War of Independance.
72. Does Obama intend to launch an attack
Vardina   (04.11.10)
on Israel together with the UN member states? Reminds me of Germany's anti Jewish laws in prewar Germany. The difference is that presently we are an independent nation in our country and no one will force us to commit suicide or forsake our holy city Jerusalem. Obama too has his limits. We shall not be sacrificed for his prsonal ambitions. He wants to prove how smart he is? Let him show results in Afghanistan and Iraq to begin with. What a great success he has been with Iran! Only Israel is his main problem...
73. #1: Two states solution - only if Arabs
Vardina   (04.11.10)
presently living in Israel will be moved to a Palestinian staate of call it whatever you want. Otherwise agreeing to a two state solutiion will be suicide/
74. Sounds like - "All we have to do is dry the Atlantic..."
L T   (04.11.10)
"...and then teleport Israel over there, and if they don't like it, then we'll take it to the Security Council" Well, good look convincing the Palestinians towards peace.
75. He is basically proposing an attack against Israel by US
(04.11.10)
Or at the very least a threat of attack. I don't think US troops are going home after Iraq, we all know they'll be taking a detour through Israel.
76. 55/ Ernie the irish milkman
funkyyaya ,   london   (04.11.10)
Read some books please....
77. Peace Plan
Swoop ,   Missoula,USA   (04.11.10)
Who guarantees Isreal's security, and for how long?
78. Brezeztinksky demands terror state for West Bank/Gaza
Bruce Stein ,   Chicago USA   (04.11.10)
This is the same Carter/Brzeztinski that "stabbed the Shaw in the back"(Haig) and brought the dictator/tyrants to Iran' that parade as religious fanatics. Brez demands "no Jews in parts of Jerusalem". If Obama or any of his people want to come to Israel; give them the Israeli nuclear scientist "treatment": no visa...persona non grata...Yankee go home...
79. #76 #66 etc - Why so sensitive?
IRISH MILKMAN ,   BELFAST IRELAND   (04.11.10)
I read a couple of books funkyyaya(?) and they all point to the same conclusion. The Israeli occupation is unifying world opinion against it. There is no domestic motivation to change the status quo. The US increasingly views it's association as a liability. Palestine will defer to the UN/US/quartet. They will issue a judgement and see that it is realised. This will happen, so plan ahead, fill the policy vacuum and stop this infantile cheerleading.
80. #79 Ernie
Ron ,   US   (04.11.10)
Seems you need to read more than two books in order to expand your limited horizons. Israel will determine her own destiny. The Palestinians have done nothing to establish a state and remain dependent on Israel. It will be a step in the right direction when the Palestinians take some initiative instead of reigning terror on tiny Israel forcing Israel to respond.
81. Brzezinski's Peace Proposal #7
Hunt S. Cross ,   England   (04.12.10)
As is always being pointed out, legal principles actually point to Israel's being entitled to East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Golan Heights, having liberated the first two from illegal occupation, arguably the Golan, as well, Britain and France having had no authority to vary the Mandate by swapping territory in 1922, all in the course of a defensive war. Alan Smith chooses to forget that Israel immediately offered to return all territory captured in the Six Day War in exchange for peace but was rewarded with the "three no's" of the Khartoum Conference proving that then, and to-day's events prove it still, that the greater part of Islamic opinion seeks the destruction of Israel, not peace. There is no moral obligation on Israel to hand over any more territory than it already has, yet Israel has made a series of generous offers, up to and including in Olmert's time. The Palestinians turned them all down and chose to cease negotiations or even to start an intifada. Earlier this year one Palestinian Fatah parliamentarian opined that a divison of Jerusalem should be regarded as the first step in the destruction of the Jewish state, and his party and Hamas both continue to envisage that end, while the prophecy in Hamas' charter concerning all Jews is well-known. Brzezinski is as unconcerned with the facts as is Obama, and Obama is as unconcerned with the facts as is Brzezinski. The least said about the UN, the better. Time to outflank them both.
Previous talkbacks
Back to article