Remember the recent attack on their office in Gaza? They are probably so scared now that they have taken the word ‘terrorist’ – but only when it applies to terrorist acts committed against Israel – from their lexicon. ---As Jeffrey Goldberg wrote on 23 March (the Atlantic): Dear Reuters, you must be kidding Those Israelis and their crazy terms! I mean, referring to a fatal bombing of civilians as a "terrorist attack"? Who are they kidding? Everyone knows that a fatal bombing of Israeli civilians should be referred to as a "teachable moment." Or as a "venting of certain frustrations." Or as "an understandable reaction to Jewish perfidy." Or perhaps as "a very special episode of 'Cheers.'" Anything but "a terrorist attack." I suppose Reuters will mark the 10th anniversary of 9/11 by referring to the attacks as "an exercise in urban renewal." The mind reels. ---

http://emunadate.blogspot.com/2010/11/blog-post.html

Not like Palestinians would blow up a bus right?

If it was a "strike" that seems to me like it's an act of war, meaning that Israel should use it's all to defend itself against the Palestinians.

..wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters#Criticism_and_controversy

Try 17 instead of 400+ roadblocks.

evidence - in israel ? im glad, in the rest of the world, its not... you are brainwashed, all together... and when you happen to look - at such a rare occassion - outside your brainwashed country, then shock is big... hm ?

Hey folks, we KNOW who did this. Reuters just told you it was a PALESTINIAN Strike!!! What part of PALESTINIAN was NOT understood!!!???

Thats what Israel will be afraid of next , its own shadow. No wonder Zion is losing the PR war.

I'd like to know how they called London boming and September 11

Most of system of moving forward are limitite due to violation and creats of sinister gang devolpe were security dont even.expect them to be among youth and their colleague i may say this in order make a turn toward devolpmemt of democracy have loyalt of integrity