Opinion
Real meaning of UN vote
Dan Calic
Published: 02.12.12, 11:07
Comment Comment
Print comment Print comment
Back to article
66 Talkbacks for this article
61. # 38, 46 & 60
Harold ,   USA   (12.03.12)
Just remember what Britain, France, Spain, Sweden and other countries told Israeli Ambassadors today about the new proposed settlements. Sanction follows.
62. # 30
Stan ,   Israel   (12.03.12)
Absolute crap !
63. International Criminal Court
Harold ,   USA   (12.03.12)
Most of the commentators are including ICC in their comments that means the new Palestinian State will report Israel to that court very soon.
64. The UN
ltrail ,   United States   (12.04.12)
I used to believe that the USofA needed to remain in the UN, if only to remain a VETO power in the Security Council. But I am ever more leaning toward the USofA disassociating itself from the UN completely. The State of Israel is compelled to ignore what the world's nations want them to do, and so can the USofA.. The UN is no longer worthy of respect. Nor is the UN worthy of any energy spent in its chambers. The USofA stands WITH, and supports, the State of Israel.
65. To: No. 63
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (12.04.12)
Well, Israel can now bring the ersatz "Palestinians" before the ICC. Terrorism is a war crime. Didn't you know that? Self-defense is not. Didn't you know that, either? More fool you.
66. To: No. 61
Sarah B ,   U.S.A. / Israel   (12.04.12)
Yeah? What sanctions? All three countries are positively salivating over the prospects of acquiring cheap Israeli natural gas from the two huge natural gas fields recently discovered off the coast of Haifa. So .... I repeat. What sanctions? You're a fool, Harold. We know it. You do not have to persist in proving it -- we believe in your idiocy. WE BELIEVE. Haven't you embarrassed yourself enough?
Previous talkbacks
Back to article