So, the only change would be Syria back in control of the Golan Heights? Since Jordan, which was in control of the West Bank on 4 June 1967 gave up its claims to the West Bank in 1988, later codified in treaty negotiations and signed in 1994. ["The resolution also 'underlines that it will not recognize any changes to the 4 June 1967 lines, including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties through negotiations.'"

You can't take the UN seriously anymore. There are just a bunch of diplomatic cowards running around trying to appease Muslim terrorists. So, why should Israel take it seriously? Even France and Britain afraid of terrorists have turned cowards. Only the US veto brings people to their senses.

So, the only change would be Syria back in control of the Golan Heights? Since Jordan, which was in control of the West Bank on 4 June 1967 gave up its claims to the West Bank in 1988, later codified in treaty negotiations and signed in 1994. ["The resolution also 'underlines that it will not recognize any changes to the 4 June 1967 lines, including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties through negotiations.'"

they have watched calmly as genocide occurred in many countries: iraq,
syria, lebanon, algeria, sudan, congo, el salvador, handuras, rawanda....

reeking of appeasement and weakness, france long ago lost its heros. it is a country now in fear of its immigrants. sweden likewise is fearful of its immigrants. netherland goes with whoever makes the most noise. no badge of honor for the dutch. the rest bolivia, ivory coast, peru, kuwait not much to write about it. finally khazakstn and china, who play both sides but also kiss rear ends to curry favour.\

you see why hitler had such an easy time rolling up europe- it is continent of cowards and appeasers.