2. Effin' bloody hell: you either have 'stuff' on him, that can
(01.21.19)
persuade any old Likudnik, that the man is a crook or you don't! You present it to the AG and I'm sure he can decide for himself. Evidence has to be unequivocal and straight forward. If it's convoluted & opaque then something stinks............ after all: we're talking politics here and in that realm things are always more fuzzy than with us, the average, working stiffs.