As Israeli soldiers reenter Gaza and bomb Lebanon, and Israeli citizens seek shelter from Hizbullah's missiles, the world despairingly wonders whether peace between Israel and its neighbors can ever take root. It can – but only if America reverses course.
To achieve peace in the Middle East, as in any region, there is a necessary principle that every party must learn: The initiation of force
is evil. And the indispensable means of teaching it is to ensure that the initiating side is defeated and punished. Decisive retaliatory force must be wielded against the aggressor.
So long as one side has reason to think it will benefit from initiating force against its neighbors, war must result. Yet this is precisely what America's immoral foreign policy gives the Palestinian Authority, Hamas and Hizbullah reason to think.
Teaching the wrong lessons
Israel is a free country, which recognizes the rights of its citizens, whatever their race or religion, and which prospers through business and trade. It has no use for war and no interest in conquest. But for years, Arafat and the Palestinian authorities, with the aid of Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and other states, sought not to learn the conditions of freedom, but to annihilate the only free nation in their midst: Israel.
But did the United States demand that the Palestinian leadership be destroyed? No. Bill Clinton invited Arafat to dine at the White House and George W. Bush declared that peace requires Israel to give in to its aggressor's insistence on a state.
Worse still, as part of the "two-state solution," Bush demanded that Israel withdraw to its pre-1967 borders. In 1967 Israel captured the Golan Heights, West Bank and Gaza Strip after yet another attempt by Arab nations to annihilate it. To give back any of this land – as Israel has done in the face of international pressure – teaches the Arabs that they can launch wars against Israel with impunity.
If they at first do not succeed militarily, they need only continue issuing threats against Israel and arming suicide-bombers--and eventually the land they lost in a war they initiated will be returned to them. They can then start the process anew, as they have since Israel withdrew from Lebanon and Gaza.
Profiting from terrorism
In order to move toward his "two state solution," Bush championed elections in the Palestinian territories and Lebanon, which predictably brought Hamas and Hizbullah into government. Terrorism, Bush is thus teaching the killers, is the means to political power.
The reason peace eludes the Middle East is therefore not difficult to discern. The lesson President Bush is conveying to the Arabs and Islamists--that the initiation of force is practical – is a continuation of the lesson America's foreign policy has been teaching for decades. The Egyptians seized the Suez Canal from France and Britain in 1956 – and the US demanded that the Europeans not retaliate.
Later, Israel had the Palestinian terrorists surrounded in Lebanon in 1982 – and we brokered their release.
Many Arabs idolized a terrorist for hijacking airliners and murdering civilians – and we poured money into his regime, hailed him for winning the Nobel Peace Prize in 1994, and demanded Israel enter into a protracted "peace" process that consisted of concession after concession and terror attack after terror attack. What possible conclusion could the Arab world draw but that the initiation of force is practical? So long as they have grounds to believe that, war is inescapable.
If we truly seek peace, we must reverse this perverse lesson. We must proclaim the objective conditions of peace. This means declaring to Arab nations that Israel, as a free country, has a moral right to exist, that the Arabs and Palestinians are the initiators of the conflict and that aggression on their part is evil and will not be tolerated. And it means encouraging Israel not to negotiate and compromise with its current assailants, but to destroy them.
Only when the initiators of force learn that their actions lead not to world sympathy and political power, but to their own deaths, will peace be possible in the Middle East.
Dr. Onkar Ghate is a senior fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine, CA. The Institute promotes objectivism, the philosophy of Ayn Rand – author of "Atlas Shrugged" and "The Fountainhead." Contact the writer at firstname.lastname@example.org