Ynetnews > News
Search


   Israel News

Israel News
Israel Opinion
Israel Business
Israel Culture
Jewish
Israel Travel
Israel Activism
Dating
Shop
Olmert Probe

PM Olmert Photo: Gil Yohanan
PM Olmert Photo: Gil Yohanan
 
 

 

Olmert to petition High Court against Talansky deposition

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's attorneys to challenge decision allowing officials to take deposition of fundraiser Morris Talansky

Aviram Zino
Published: 05.10.08, 20:45 / Israel News

Fighting Back: Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's attorneys intend to petition the High Court of Justice in the coming days in a bid to annul a previous decision by the Jerusalem District Court that allowed officials to take the deposition of fundraiser Morris Talansky.

 

Olmert's attorneys believe that allowing Talansky to testify at this stage would undermine the possibility of holding a fair investigation into suspicions that the prime minister received funds unlawfully.

 

Olmert Probe
Olmert: I must consider ramifications of resignation  / Yitzhak Benhorin
In interview with US newspapers, prime minister addresses new police investigation against him, says he does not believe he should step down at this point
Full Story
The attorneys are expected to prepare the petition at the beginning of the week, but the date for submitting it is unknown at this time. For the time being, Olmert has not been asked to submit for another police interrogation session over the affair.

 

Olmert defense team's decision comes after the Jerusalem District Court granted Friday Attorney General Menachem Mazuz's request to take a deposition from Talansky, an American businessman believed to have transferred funds to Olmert during the latter's tenure as Jerusalem mayor and as industry, trade and labor minister.

 

State Prosecutor Moshe Lador told the court that Talansky "has expressed his concern to a police officer that Olmert might send someone to hurt him."

 

The court noted that "while the state prosecutor stressed that it is inconceivable to attribute to any of the respondents the intent to influence the witness or deter him from testifying, given the subjective feeling of the witness, there's a concern that this might dissuade him from testifying."

 

Roni Sofer contributed to the report

 

talkbacktalkback   PrintPrint  Send to friendSend to friend   
Tag with Del.icio.us Bookmark to del.icio.us

 
4 Talkbacks for this article    See all talkbacks
Please wait for the talkbacks to load

 

RSS RSS | About | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of use | Advertise with us

Site developed by  RealCommerce - content management experts