Legal counsel warns MKs: Leak info and you'll be prosecuted - Israel News, Ynetnews
 
ynetnews
web


   Israel News

Israel News
World News
Israel Opinion
Jewish
Israel Business
Israel Culture
Israel Travel
'Prisoner X' Affair

MK Ahmad Tibi
MK Ahmad Tibi 
 
 

Legal counsel warns MKs: Leak info and you'll be prosecuted

After MKs exposed 'Prisoner X' affair during live broadcast from plenum, Knesset's legal advisor says lawmakers disclosing state secrets will not be protected by immunity

Moran Azulay
Published: 02.18.13, 20:50 / Israel News

After a number of Knesset members urged Justice Minister Yaakov Ne'eman to address allegations that an Australian national committed suicide in an Israeli prison, thereby blowing the cover off the "Prisoner X" affair, the issue of parliamentary immunity upon revealing State secrets has become a sensitive matter.

 

Knesset Legal Advisor Eyal Yinon determined Monday that Knesset members cannot disclose state secrets to the Knesset plenum and then utilize their parliamentary immunity.

 

Related articles:

 

Immunity for revealing State secrets would be applied to an MK if he or she spoke without preplanning, "in the heat of an argument or in response to things said," Yinon said, but "preplanning a statement - that is in fact a felony that cannot be protected by immunity and a member of Knesset can be prosecuted for the said felony, as can any other person."

 

Yinon issued his evaluation following the occurrences in the Israeli parliament last week, as the "Prisoner X" affair, which had been under gag order, was exposed by the inquiries of MKs Zahava Gal-On and Ahmad Tibi, which were broadcast live on Israeli television.

  

סגורסגור

שליחה לחבר

 הקלידו את הקוד המוצג
תמונה חדשה

שלח
הסרטון נשלח לחברך

סגורסגור

הטמעת הסרטון באתר שלך

 קוד להטמעה:


 

According to the Knesset advisor, "The Knesset plenum and committees are not arraignment-proof. The fact that the felonious statement was said in the Knesset does not mean that it automatically grants immunity."

 

Yinon added that a Knesset member who wishes to clarify issues under gag order should motion the relevant minister or committee chairperson to hold a covert meeting on the issue, or approach the authorities.

 

The decision whether to interrogate or sue an MK is under the jurisdiction of the attorney general.

 

The legal advisor stressed that "Political statements are a key component of an MK's job," adding that immunity was instated in order to allow members of parliament the freedom to pursue their position the best they can, but that MKs must nevertheless use their discretion to avoid causing harm to the public or to the Knesset.

 

"Certain statements were rendered forbidden so as to protect other important interests. The legislator thus determined, for example, that incitement to racism, violence or terror, revealing secret information, slander, breach of gag order etc. are expressions that may be libel, under certain conditions, to criminal prosecution," the Knesset legal advisor noted.

 

 

commentcomment   PrintPrint  Send to friendSend to friend   
Tag with Del.icio.us Bookmark to del.icio.us



 
21 Talkbacks for this article    See all talkbacks
Please wait for the talkbacks to load

 

RSS RSS | About | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of use | Advertise with us | Site Map

Site developed by  YIT Advanced Technology Solutions