Obama defends US surveillance program as trade-off for security

US President Barack Obama on Friday staunchly defended the sweeping US government surveillance of Americans' phone and internet activity, calling it a modest encroachment on privacy that was necessary to defend the United States from attack.

Obama said the programs were "trade-offs" designed to strike a balance between privacy concerns and keeping Americans safe from terrorist attacks. He said they were supervised by federal judges and Congress, and that lawmakers had been briefed.

Related stories:

• Obama's UN nominee advocated invasion of Israel
• Obama to name Susan Rice as national security adviser
• Intel reports: CIA did not always know targets of drone strikes
  

"Nobody is listening to your telephone calls. That's not what this program is about," Obama told reporters during a visit to California's Silicon Valley.

"In the abstract you can complain about Big Brother and how this is a potential program run amok, but when you actually look at the details, I think we've struck the right balance," Obama said. "There are trade-offs involved."

Obama in the White House (Photo: White House)

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that federal authorities have been tapping into the central servers of companies including Google, Apple and Facebook to gain access to emails, photos and other files allowing analysts to track a person's movements and contacts.

That added to privacy concerns sparked by a report in Britain's Guardian newspaper that the National Security Agency had been mining phone records from millions of customers of a subsidiary of Verizon Communications.

The two reports launched a broad debate about privacy rights and the proper limits of government surveillance in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States.

Obama, who pledged to run the most transparent administration in US history, said in his first comments on the controversy that he came into office with a "healthy skepticism" about the surveillance programs but had come to believe "modest encroachments on privacy" were worth it.

Obama said his administration also had instituted audits and tightened safeguards to ensure the programs did not overstep their bounds.

"You can't have 100 percent security and also then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience," he said. "We're going to have to make some choices as a society."

While members of the US Congress are routinely briefed by the NSA on secret surveillance programs, it is not clear how much they knew about the widespread surveillance of private internet activity.

Representative Henry Waxman, a California Democrat, said he thought the administration had good intentions but stressed the program was "just too broad an overreach."

"I think there ought to be some connection to suspicion, otherwise we can say that any intrusion on all of our privacy is justified for the times that we will catch the few terrorists," Waxman told MSNBC. "Good intentions are not enough. We need protections against government intrusion that goes too far."

• Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter
  

• Receive Ynetnews updates directly to your desktop