Channels

Photo: MCT
Major win for gay activists
Photo: MCT

Supreme Court strikes US marriage provision

US Supreme Court issues two historic rulings regarding same-sex marriages, striking down federal law defining marriage as only between members of opposite sex, ruling against California decision to ban gay marriages, both by 5-4

The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that legally married same-sex couples should get the same US benefits as heterosexual couples.

 

Also on Wednesday, the court paved the way for gay marriage in California but sidestepped a broad ruling that would affect the whole country by saying it could not decide a closely watched case on the constitutionality of a California law that restricts marriage to opposite-sex couples.

 

Related stories:

 

The court invalidated a provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act that has prevented married gay couples from receiving a range of tax, health and retirement benefits that are generally available to married people. The vote was 5-4.

 

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion.

 

By finding on a 5-4 vote that supporters of the ban on gay marriage did not have standing to defend the law, the court effectively gave the green light for at least some gay weddings to proceed in California because a federal judge's original ruling that struck down the law, known as Proposition 8, will remain intact.

 

Same-sex marriage has been adopted by 12 states and the District of Columbia. Another 18,000 couples were married in California during a brief period when same-sex unions were legal there.

  

"Under DOMA, same-sex married couples have their lives burdened, by reason of government decree, in visible and public ways," Kennedy said.

 

"DOMA's principal effect is to identify a subset of state-sanctioned marriages and make them unequal," he said.

 

He was joined by the court's four liberal justices.

 

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented.

 

Scalia read his dissent aloud. He said the court should not have decided the case.

 

But, given that it did, he said, "we have no power under the Constitution to invalidate this democratically adopted legislation."

 

The law was passed in 1996 by broad majorities in the House of Representatives and the Senate, and signed into law by Democratic President Bill Clinton. Since then, many lawmakers who voted for the law and Clinton have renounced their support.

  

 

  • Receive Ynetnews updates directly to your desktop

 

 

 


פרסום ראשון: 06.26.13, 18:13
 new comment
Warning:
This will delete your current comment