WASHINGTON - Iran’s Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, said in a Washington Post interview Sunday night that Tehran is a hundred percent committed to a complete agreement with the P5+1, but also uttered non-negotiable stances on main issues.
Zarif told columnist David Ignatius that Iran
will continue to enrich uranium, and it is not planning on giving up the heavy water reactor in Arak.
“We do not see any reason now that we have put so much time and effort in it and brought them to the point of abandoning the illusion of zero enrichment in Iran,” he said.
Arak heavy water reactor in Iran (Photo: Getty Images) Nuclear talks in Geneva (Photo: Reuters)
Zarif maintained the Arak reactor will remain in place.
“We cannot roll back the clock 20 years and ask Iran to simply get rid of a project that has been the subject of a great deal of human and material investment,” he said.
Zarif also cynically responded to the US’s request to close the Fordow reactor.
“If you sit in Iran, and you see people having concerns about Fordow, the only conclusion you can draw is that they want to attack you. Because what is the significance of Fordow? Fordow is a facility that is under daily inspection by (International Atomic Energy Agency).”
The senior politician said that Iran’s official stance is that it does not want nuclear weapons. “We do not follow a policy of ambiguity, this is not our intention. We follow a policy of clarity that we do not seek nuclear weapons,” he said “But we’re not going to accept diktats. We are going to negotiate on all issues.”
His hard stance, it seems, was meant for US President Barack Obama, after the White House announced Thursday that 12 Iranian individuals and companies were added to the US’s blacklist.
Iran said it had stopped the agreement process with the world powers, but immediately took back the statement. Zarif said the nuclear talks
would continue despite the American’s actions, which he called damaging in a radical fashion.
Iran has been rife with disagreement in the wake of the agreement. Zarif admitted that there is an internal struggle between President Hassan Rohani
and the conservatives who are against the deal achieved in Geneva.
Last week, the commander of the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, Mohammad Ali Jafari, criticized Zarif and demanded that he step down. Zarif said that the policies crafted by Rohani and him are not only related to the nuclear issue but also to the civil war in Syria.
As Iran’s Guardians are sinking deeper and deeper into the Syrian mud, the Iranian foreign minister said Iran believes that there is no military solution to the problem in Syria,
and that he even wished that Iran would be present in the Geneva conference on January 22 to help deal with the protracted Syrian conflict.
As Zarif was trying to put out the flames, a high-ranking Israeli
delegation was attending talks in the White House in an attempt to explain Israel’s opposition to the nature and direction of negotiations over Iran's nuclear future.
The White House said Sunday that senior American representatives from the US National Security Council, led by security advisor Susan Rice, met with Israeli representatives, headed by security advisor Yossi Cohen. Officials from the US State Department and US Treasury were present during the meetings, which focused on the sanctions against Iran.
The Americans presented their plan for negotiations with Iran to the Israeli delegation; the US intends to maintain its sanctions on the energy and banking sector in Iran.
Saudi Arabia, who is also considered a key player in the Iran issue, is continuing to let the other players know how worried it is about Obama’s methods, doing so bluntly and assertively.
In an international conference in Monaco, a Saudi prince, Turki Al Faisal, blamed Obama and said that his red lines on the Iran issue, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Syrian civil war had turned into pink lines.
The prince, who was the Saudi head of intelligence and the ambassador to Washington in the past decade, doesn’t have an official position currently, but that didn’t stop him from expressing his rage regarding Washington’s management of the Middle East.
- Receive Ynetnews updates
directly to your desktop