Ehud Barak also discovered something: He showed us, while pressing for the Kadima primaries to be held, how little he understands politics. He wanted to bury Kadima in internal struggles, but ended up bringing it back to life.
To some extent, Wednesday’s primaries will reveal Kadima’s true face to the Israeli public. The party’s internal workings, way of thinking, intentions, and plans will be exposed. For the first time, the large ruling party needs to contend with itself, with its own way, and with its future. Kadima’s internal democracy and intelligence, which have been buried at the start under the grandiose and almost dictatorial plans of Ariel Sharon and his partners, will be in the limelight today and require Kadima and its registered voters to think. Alone. Without a responsible adult to accompany them. Today, Kadima has the chance to rid itself of its deceptiveness and return to the straight and narrow path.
Does Israel need a centrist party?
The test faced by Kadima’s registered voters isn’t easy: Their choice is mostly between two people who have likely not yet fully matured; it is doubtful whether we would want them at the helm unless it wasn’t for the special circumstances created around here in recent months. However, when it comes to politics, the choice is made out of the available supply, rather than fantasy. Therefore, there is no other choice, and Kadima’s members need to choose between a woman whose years in politics may or may not have prepared her for the job and who is surrounded by Sharon’s former advisors, and a man who chose to entrust himself during the campaign in the hands of ultra-rightist advisors who prompted him to slander his rival and accuse her of making concessions to the Arabs and of racism.
Wednesday’s Kadima primary elections are a choice by default born in an unnatural way. These primaries are meant to erase one disgrace and change the way of thinking of Kadima, which promised a different kind of politics, yet soon encountered Israel’s political realities.
As opposed to common perception, an Israeli centrist party has a right to exist, and perhaps even a duty to exist. However, in order to maintain this right in the coming years, the party and its leaders must prove that they are truly attempting to lead a normative change; a change that would justify its existence and the objective it was established for: Leading a change in Israel’s political structure and preventing an ideological and practical dead-end.
Thus far, Kadima and its current leader have proven that even reality can be bent. As of tomorrow, its new leader would have to prove that reality can not only be bent – it can also be changed.