Now, the ground is shaking in the very same place. The Egyptian regime (which the US invested billions of dollars in) swung like a pendulum, and the good friend Obama, who turned a new leaf, was quick to close the door. So what has changed? Nothing. Obama had good intentions in Cairo and he still has good intentions today – but reality gets in the way.
President Obama was seeking the kind of utopia that exists nowhere. Equipped with a Nobel Peace Prize and with his “yes, we can” promises, the US president entered the political twilight zone of trial and error and tried to have it all.
He sought to encourage the moderate Arab states, yet at the same time talk about democracy. He wanted to care for the repressed Islamic opposition, yet at the same time brutally repress the terror that grows in these very same areas. This colossal confusion stemmed from flawed intelligence at best and from ignorance at worst.
Obama’s attitude to Israel could be forgiven – after all, the damage here was tolerable. The president indeed confused Jerusalem’s Gilo neighborhood with an illegal outpost at the heart of Samaria and prompted the Palestinians to insist on a settlement freeze, thereby ending peace talks, yet there’s no need to get overly excited: Even when talks take place, they lead nowhere.
In the Egyptian case, on the other hand, the confused policy conveyed by the Obama Administration may lead to irreparable damage. The gulf between his dream and realities across the Nile is absolute.
Obama wants democracy in Egypt; he wishes to promote human rights and improve the status of women. This is a noble notion, yet democracy means Muslim Brotherhood, radicalism, and Iran-style human rights. Indeed, there is nothing wrong with dreamers like Obama, but not in this profession.
- Follow Ynetnews on Facebook