Photo: FP Photo/ HO/ KHAMENEI.IR
Supreme Leader Khamenei
Photo: FP Photo/ HO/ KHAMENEI.IR

Khamenei wanted a moderate president

Op-ed: Supreme leader sought to neutralize explosive situation in Iran by giving citizens hope for change

There are those who viewed Hassan Rohani as the candidate of the reformists and interpreted his victory in the Iranian presidential election as an indication that the reformists are back on top in the Islamic Republic. But a more in-depth analysis of the situation paints an entirely different picture: It would be a grave mistake to describe Rohani as a reformist.


Rohani is Supreme Leader Khamenei's confidante. He headed Iran's Atomic Energy Organization and served as chief negotiator during nuclear negotiations with the West. Khamenei would not allow a rival to run in the election, and indeed, all the candidates who were thought to be his rivals were disqualified from the race.


Rohani won due to three main reasons: The first – he was considered the most liberal and less rigid of the candidates who were authorized to run; the second reason is that he ran as the candidate of both the reformist camp (headed by Khatami) and the pragmatic camp (headed by Rafsanjani); and finally, he won because the conservative camp had four different candidates in the election race.


Hassan Rohani votes (Photo: MCT)
Hassan Rohani votes (Photo: MCT)


Had the conservatives really been interested in winning the election, they would have "convinced" three of their candidates to drop out of the race and throw their support behind one candidate - probably Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf - thus significantly increasing his chance of getting elected. Therefore, the division within the conservative camp indicates that the regime wanted a more moderate candidate to be elected. The question is why would Khamenei and the conservative camp prefer a moderate president?


I believe the answer to this question lies in the regime's situation. Domestically, the riots of 2009 posed the greatest challenge for the regime since the Iran-Iraq War, and the regime did not want to risk another internal crisis, which may have erupted had another conservative candidate been elected, particularly after the disastrous eight years of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Only a moderate candidate can partially neutralize the explosive situation in Iran by giving the average citizen hope for even the slightest change.


Iran has also been hit hard by sanctions and isolated from the international community. The election of a relatively moderate candidate may cause the Western nations to ease the sanctions in order to "give the moderate elements within the Iranian regime a chance." This has happened in the past when Khatami was president, and it may happen again.


Soli Shahvar is the head of the Ezri Center for Iranian and Persian Gulf Studies at Haifa University



פרסום ראשון: 06.16.13, 20:02
 new comment
This will delete your current comment