Israeli technology used by Bronx DA sparks outrage

Residents fear use of Cellebrite tech, which is a digital forensics company, will potentially compromise their privacy rights and expose sensitive personal information without their knowledge or consent

Bronx residents express outrage over the district attorney's partnership with Israeli digital forensics firm: the recent partnership between Bronx District Attorney Darcel Clark's office and Israeli digital forensics company Cellebrite has sparked a wave of anger and concern among residents of the Bronx. Many residents are voicing their outrage, citing serious privacy issues associated with the collaboration.
<< Follow Ynetnews on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | TikTok >>
Read more:
The partnership's intention, as disclosed in a notice published by the district, is to equip prosecutors with enhanced tools to unlock and access data from locked or encrypted phones confiscated from individuals following their arrest. However, residents fear that this move could potentially compromise their privacy rights and expose sensitive personal information without their knowledge or consent.
2 View gallery
סלברייט יוסי כרמיל
סלברייט יוסי כרמיל
Cellebrite tech
(Photo: Ronen Akerman)
Cellebrite, a significant player in the digital forensics industry based in Israel, has garnered millions of dollars in contracts with law enforcement agencies worldwide. Its products are designed to unlock devices and extract data, allowing investigators to delve deeper into their inquiries. While law enforcement agencies tout the benefits of such technology in aiding investigations, critics argue that the secretive nature of the tools raises concerns about the potential misuse and abuse of personal information.
Aurora Maoz, director of the forensic practice group at The Bronx Defenders, has strongly criticized these technologies, labeling them an invasive invasion of privacy and an additional form of surveillance. Maoz points out that the unlocking capabilities are exclusively reserved for law enforcement, and the inner workings of the technology remain shrouded in secrecy. With limited transparency surrounding the process, residents are left questioning whether their data could be altered or manipulated during the extraction process.
The lack of public scrutiny and notification exacerbates the concerns of Bronx residents. When law enforcement agencies secure search warrants to access cellphone data, there is no requirement to inform suspects or their attorneys. Additionally, the number of warrants issued in a given jurisdiction is not disclosed, raising questions about the extent of data collection and the potential for overreach.
2 View gallery
Darcel Clark
Darcel Clark
Darcel Clark
(Photo: Screenshot)
Defense attorneys also voice their frustration with the lack of transparency surrounding warrant applications and approvals. Benjamin Burger, a staff attorney in The Legal Aid Society's digital forensics unit, highlights the limited review conducted by judges, granting considerable deference to district attorneys and law enforcement. With warrant rejections largely undisclosed, defense attorneys are left with the arduous task of contesting data seizures after the fact.
The Bronx district attorney's office's decision to expand its partnership with Cellebrite is not an isolated case. Similar collaborations with the company have been established with other law enforcement agencies, including the Manhattan district attorney's office and the New York Police Department. This trend has further fueled concerns among residents, who fear that their privacy rights are being disregarded in favor of enhanced investigative capabilities.
As Bronx residents express their discontent and outrage, the debate surrounding the balance between law enforcement needs and individual privacy rights continues to escalate. The privacy concerns raised by residents highlight the need for greater transparency and accountability when employing digital forensics tools. Striking the right balance between effective investigations and safeguarding privacy remains a pressing issue that requires careful consideration from law enforcement agencies and elected officials.
First published: 22:22, 07.13.23
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.