Swiss agree to outlaw facial coverings in 'burqa ban' vote

Constitutional amendment proposed by the far-right Swiss People’s Party passes with 51.2%, with MP dubbing the facial covering 'a symbol of extreme, political Islam' which he says has no place in Switzerland

Reuters|
PrintFind an error? Report us
A far-right proposal to ban facial coverings in Switzerland won a narrow victory in a binding referendum on Sunday instigated by the same group that organized a 2009 ban on new minarets.
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

    • The measure to amend the Swiss constitution passed by a 51.2-48.8% margin, provisional official results showed.
    3 View gallery
    A torn poster of the initiative 'Yes to the burqa-ban' is seen in Lausanne, Switzerland     A torn poster of the initiative 'Yes to the burqa-ban' is seen in Lausanne, Switzerland
    A torn poster of the initiative 'Yes to the burqa-ban' is seen in Lausanne, Switzerland
    (Photo: EPA)
    The proposal under the Swiss system of direct democracy does not mention Islam directly and also aims to stop violent street protesters from wearing masks, yet local politicians, media and campaigners have dubbed it the burqa ban.
    “In Switzerland, our tradition is that you show your face. That is a sign of our basic freedoms,” Walter Wobmann, chairman of the referendum committee and a member of parliament for the Swiss People’s Party, had said before the vote.
    He called facial covering “a symbol for this extreme, political Islam which has become increasingly prominent in Europe and which has no place in Switzerland”.
    The Central Council of Muslims in Switzerland called the vote a dark day for the community.
    “Today’s decision opens old wounds, further expands the principle of legal inequality, and sends a clear signal of exclusion to the Muslim minority,” it said.
    3 View gallery
    Walter Wobmann, National Councillor SVP and initiator of Burqa ban initiative, gives an interview, at the meeting place of the supporters of the initiative, in Bern, Switezrland     Walter Wobmann, National Councillor SVP and initiator of Burqa ban initiative, gives an interview, at the meeting place of the supporters of the initiative, in Bern, Switezrland
    Walter Wobmann, National Councillor SVP and initiator of Burqa ban initiative, gives an interview, at the meeting place of the supporters of the initiative, in Bern, Switzerland
    (Photo: EPA)
    It promised legal challenges to laws implementing the ban and a fundraising drive to help women who are fined.
    The proposal predated the COVID-19 pandemic, which has required adults to wear masks in many settings to prevent the spread of infection.
    Two cantons already have local bans on face coverings.
    France banned wearing a full-face veil in public in 2011 and Denmark, Austria, the Netherlands and Bulgaria have full or partial bans on wearing face coverings in public.
    3 View gallery
    People from anti-racist, feminist and ecologist associations and parties demonstrate against the 'anti-burqa' initiative on the Plaine de Plainpalais in Geneva, Switzerland     People from anti-racist, feminist and ecologist associations and parties demonstrate against the 'anti-burqa' initiative on the Plaine de Plainpalais in Geneva, Switzerland
    People from anti-racist, feminist and ecologist associations and parties demonstrate against the 'anti-burqa' initiative on the Plaine de Plainpalais in Geneva, Switzerland
    (Photo: EPA)
    Practically no one in Switzerland wears a burqa and only around 30 women wear the niqab, the University of Lucerne estimates. Muslims make up 5% of the Swiss population of 8.6 million people, most with roots in Turkey, Bosnia and Kosovo.
    The government had urged people to vote against a ban.
    “After the ban on minarets, a majority of Swiss voters has once again backed an initiative that discriminates against a single religious community and needlessly stirs up fears and division,” Amnesty International said.
    “The veiling ban is not a measure for women’s liberation, but a dangerous symbolic policy that violates freedom of expression and religion.”
    Comments
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    ""