As U.S. poised to restrict abortion, what do Jews have to say?

American Jews favor abortion rights, more than any other religious group; 'Our religious freedom demands that we have access to abortion care when it is needed and wanted,' says a rabbi

Philissa Cramer / JTA|
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency and our partner sites at 70 Faces Media have answered the question many times over the years, a testament to its persistence in political life and its significance to American Jews: What do Jews believe about abortion?
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

  • After a new report that the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed a majority opinion in February that would overturn Roe v. Wade, many find themselves asking - What do Jews believe about abortion?
    4 View gallery
    מחאה מול בית המשפט העליון בוושינגטון
    מחאה מול בית המשפט העליון בוושינגטון
    Reproductive rights protests in front of the U.S. Supreme Court
    (Photo: AP)
    Here’s what we know: American Jews favor abortion rights, more than any other religious group, according to public polling. And traditional Jewish law permits (and even requires) abortion in some circumstances, particularly when the life or health of the pregnant person is at stake.
    That means if the leaked Supreme Court ruling does become the law of the land, Jewish women in dozens of states will almost certainly become unable to access care that they might well decide is required religiously.
    “What Jewish community would want to continue to live in a place where they are potentially barred from following halacha (Jewish law)?” wrote Ephraim Sherman, an Orthodox Jew and health care professional. “Is a community even allowed by halacha to continue living in such a place?”
    Liberal Jews in America have been advocating for reproductive rights as long as they have been contested — so, forever. In 1989, American Jews attended a rally protesting calls to roll back abortion rights; and in 1998, Jewish groups responded to the murder of Dr. Barnett Slepian, a New York abortion provider who was killed just after returning home from saying Kaddish for his father.
    4 View gallery
    ה סנאטורית אליזבת וורן בהפגנה נגד ביטול הזכות לה הפלה הפלות ב ארה"ב מול בית המשפט העליון ב וושינגטון
    ה סנאטורית אליזבת וורן בהפגנה נגד ביטול הזכות לה הפלה הפלות ב ארה"ב מול בית המשפט העליון ב וושינגטון
    Senator Elizabeth Warren protests in front of the Supreme Court
    (Photo: Reuters)
    Those groups have stepped up advocacy as threats to Roe v. Wade have mounted. The National Council of Jewish Women formed Rabbis for Repro to bring abortion talk to synagogues and other Jewish spaces; Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg, the group’s scholar in residence, has articulated Jewish views on abortion in essays and on national TV.
    Meanwhile, Orthodox Jews in America have shifted rightward in recent decades. The 2020 exploration of that shift suggests that one reason it didn’t happen earlier was Republicans’ focus on abortion in the 1980s, which didn’t resonate with Orthodoxy. But recently, the alignment of Orthodoxy and Republican politics has led to more vocal participation by Orthodox Jews in abortion discourse.
    In 2019, when New York widened its abortion law, several Orthodox groups condemned the move. Some Orthodox women questioned why they would oppose a change that made it easier to follow rabbinic advice. At the time, an Orthodox leader argued that “rights” are the wrong way to talk about the Jewish stance on abortion.
    “Blanket bans on abortion, to be sure, would deprive Jewish women of the ability to act responsibly in cases where abortion is halachically required,” wrote the leader, Rabbi Avi Shafran. “And so, what Orthodox groups like Agudath Israel of America, for which I work, have long promoted is the regulation of abortion through laws that generally prohibit the unjustifiable killing of fetuses while protecting the right to abortion in exceptional cases.”
    4 View gallery
    סניף של Planned Parenthood
    סניף של Planned Parenthood
    Planned Parenthood
    (Photo: Shutterstock)
    An estimated quarter of American women will have an abortion by age 45, many Jews among them. First-person accounts from a few of them have been published.
    For example, there's a self-described “very Jewish” story from a rabbi who says she had an abortion “simply” because she didn’t want to be pregnant — a choice that she says Jewish tradition protects, too.
    “If anyone tries to argue that abortion restrictions are justified under the prerogative of religious freedom, we can explain that our religious freedom demands that we have access to abortion care when it is needed and wanted,” wrote the rabbi, Rachael Pass.
    And a longtime Jewish feminist, Barbara Dobkin, recalled how she helped a friend get an illegal abortion in 1966. “What about the crisis of losing the right to make decisions about our own bodies?” she asked. “Where is the communal outcry about that?”
    4 View gallery
    מחאה מול בית המשפט העליון בוושינגטון
    מחאה מול בית המשפט העליון בוושינגטון
    Protests in front of the Supreme Court
    (Photo: EPA)
    That outcry is being felt today, as the leaked Supreme Court opinion resonates across the country. It remains to be seen whether the final decision matches the draft; the court generally releases most of its rulings each year in June.
    But we know that legal analysts are already envisioning a Jewish woman as the perfect plaintiff for a case challenging a ruling overturning Roe v. Wade.
    We know that the National Council of Jewish Women is planning a Jewish Rally for Abortion Justice in Washington, D.C., on May 17 and that Jewish reproductive-rights advocates are planning for a post-Roe world.
    And we know that for Orthodox groups, the balancing act between backing Republicans and defending Jewish law and the right to follow it just got harder.

    Content distributed by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency news service.
    Comments
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    ""