Raisi says no deal with IAEA probe, threatens Israel if military actions taken

Iranian president says inspectors must end their probe on man-made uranium particles before deal can proceed; says Zionist regime at risk should Israel strike Iranian nuclear sites

Associated Press, Ynet|Updated:
Iran's president warned Monday that if Israel decided to carry out its threats to destroy Iran’s nuclear program, “they will see if anything from the Zionist regime will remain or not.”
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

  • In a rare news conference marking his first year in office, President Ebrahim Raisi issued his threats against Israel and played down the ongoing negotiations to finalize a nuclear agreement despite the international attention on the deal as talks in Vienna hang in the balance
    3 View gallery
    נשיא איראן איברהים ראיסי מסיבת עיתונאים שנה לכהונתו הסכם הגרעין
    נשיא איראן איברהים ראיסי מסיבת עיתונאים שנה לכהונתו הסכם הגרעין
    Ebrahim Raisi in a press conference on Monday
    (Photo: AFP)
    It took Raisi well over an hour before fully acknowledging the ongoing negotiations. He eventually said that any roadmap to restore Tehran's tattered nuclear deal with world powers must see international inspectors end their probe on man-made uranium particles found at undeclared sites in the country.
    Tehran and Washington have traded written responses in recent weeks on the finer points of the roadmap, which would see sanctions lifted against Iran in exchange for it restricting its rapidly advancing nuclear program.
    Amid the tensions, Israel is suspected in carrying out a series of attacks targeting Iranian nuclear sites, as well as a prominent scientist.
    The International Atomic Energy Agency has for years sought Iran's answer to questions about man-made uranium particles found at undeclared sites. U.S. intelligence agencies, Western nations and the IAEA have said Iran ran an organized nuclear weapons program until 2003. Iran long has denied ever seeking nuclear weapons.
    3 View gallery
    רפאל גרוסי ראש סבא"א הסוכנות הבינלאומית לאנרגיה אטומית מציג דגם של מצלמה שמותקנת ב מתקני גרעין של איראן
    רפאל גרוסי ראש סבא"א הסוכנות הבינלאומית לאנרגיה אטומית מציג דגם של מצלמה שמותקנת ב מתקני גרעין של איראן
    IAEA chair Rafael Grossi exhibits cameras disabled by Iran in nuclear sites
    (Photo: EPA)
    As a member of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Iran is obligated to explain the radioactive traces and to provide assurances that they are not being used as part of a nuclear weapons program. Iran found itself criticized by the IAEA’s Board of Governors in June over its failure to answer questions about the sites to the inspectors’ satisfaction.
    Raisi mentioned the traces — referring to its as a “safeguards” issue using the IAEA’s language.
    “Without settlement of safeguard issues, speaking about an agreement has no meaning,” Raisi said.
    Under the 2015 nuclear deal, Tehran could enrich uranium to 3.67%, while maintaining a stockpile of uranium of 300 kilograms (660 pounds) under constant scrutiny of IAEA surveillance cameras and inspectors. Then-President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew America from the accord in 2018, setting the stage for years of rising tensions.
    3 View gallery
    IAEA inspector at the uranium enrichment facility in Natanz, Iran
    IAEA inspector at the uranium enrichment facility in Natanz, Iran
    IAEA inspector at the uranium enrichment facility in Natanz, Iran
    (Photo: AP)
    As of the last public IAEA count, Iran has a stockpile of some 3,800 kilograms (8,370 pounds) of enriched uranium. More worrying for nonproliferation experts, Iran now enriches uranium up to 60% purity — a level it never reached before that is a short, technical step away from 90%. Those experts warn Iran has enough 60%-enriched uranium to reprocess into fuel for at least one nuclear bomb.
    First published: 13:03, 08.29.22
    Comments
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    ""