Israel's High Court rejects challenges to Lebanon sea deal

Pending final approval before deal's signing, High Court clears objections standing in the way of the maritime agreement with Lebanon; both countries hope deal will lead to regional stability
|
Israel’s Supreme Court on Sunday threw out four legal challenges to a landmark maritime agreement between Israel and Lebanon, clearing a major hurdle for the deal that could mark a major breakthrough in relations between the two countries.
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

  • The court did not immediately release its reasons for rejecting the challenges, which were submitted by an influential conservative policy group and an ultranationalist Israeli politician, among others.
    2 View gallery
    אוניית קידוח
    אוניית קידוח
    Karish oil rig
    (Photo: Reuters)
    The court’s ruling paves the way for the agreement to be given final approval by Israel’s the government, a step expected later this week.
    Lebanon and Israel both claim some 860 square kilometers (330 square miles) of the Mediterranean Sea. At stake are rights over exploiting undersea natural gas reserves.
    Lebanon hopes gas exploration will help lift its country out of its spiraling economic crisis. Israel also hopes to exploit gas reserves while also easing tensions with its northern neighbor.
    2 View gallery
    ראש הממשלה יאיר לפיד, נשיא לבנון מישל עאון
    ראש הממשלה יאיר לפיד, נשיא לבנון מישל עאון
    Lebanese President Michel Aoun, Prime Minister Yair Lapid
    (Photo: Amit Shabi, AP)
    Israel and Lebanon and formally have been at war since Israel’s establishment in 1948. In 2006, Israel and the Shiite militant group Hezbollah fought a monthlong, inconclusive war and tensions with the group remain high.
    Israel says the deal will bolster its security, help stabilize the northern frontier and boost the economy with billions in revenue from any gas discovered.
    Comments
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    ""