A woman who lived modestly for years while raising her children and managing household expenses won full rights to the family home after a divorce proceeding revealed that her husband had accumulated millions of shekels in assets during their marriage.
The couple had been married for more than 20 years and had children together. She worked as a kindergarten assistant, while he worked as a renovator in a business owned by a relative. They did not own a home during most of the marriage and lived with his father in a small, aging apartment.
They kept separate bank accounts and he accumulated millions of shekels
(Photo: Shutterstock)
For years, the couple maintained separate bank accounts. At the start of each month, the husband gave his wife several thousand shekels in cash for groceries, including supermarket shopping, produce and meat. She also paid for the children’s activities, summer camps, after-school programs and day-to-day expenses, as well as her own modest personal costs.
The family lived frugally, with no vacations abroad, restaurant outings or major purchases. The children grew up with the sense that every shekel had to be saved. After the husband’s father died, he inherited the apartment where the family had lived.
When the husband later told his wife he wanted a divorce, he asked her to leave the home. She turned to a lawyer, initially in secret, because she feared his reaction. Acting on legal advice, she filed a request for dispute resolution in Family Court.
The husband argued that, because the couple had kept their finances separate during the marriage, “what is mine is mine and what is yours is yours.”
As part of the property claim, the wife’s lawyer sought a broad document disclosure order covering all property registered in the husband’s name during the marriage. The lawyer also obtained attachment orders and orders barring the sale or transfer of assets.
The documents revealed a far different financial picture. The husband had established a contracting company with the relative for whom he worked and owned 50% of its shares. He had also accumulated significant funds from his work and business activity over the years.
The legal team contacted the Companies Registrar and the Land Registry, summoned the husband’s accountant to testify and called family members as witnesses to show that assets had been purchased through them. The inquiry found that the husband held land and commercial properties worth millions of shekels. Rental income from those properties flowed into accounts in his name, while his wife, unaware of the assets, lived hand to mouth.
During cross-examination, the husband initially claimed the assets belonged to his family. He later said the investments had failed. But the documents showed that he made decisions about the properties, signed lease agreements and benefited from the income.
The court made clear that separate bank accounts do not cancel a spouse’s rights to property accumulated during a marriage. Under Israel’s Spouses’ Property Relations Law, assets accrued during the marriage may be subject to division, particularly in a case in which the wife had carried a significant share of the costs of raising the children.
After a legal process that lasted more than a year, the sides reached an agreement under which the woman received full ownership of the residential apartment and kept the pension rights she had accrued. The husband also committed to covering expenses for the couple’s adult children, including academic studies, private health insurance and the purchase of a car for each of them.
The case highlights the importance of financial disclosure in divorce proceedings and shows that separate accounts do not necessarily prevent assets acquired during a marriage from being considered shared property.