The COVID campaign is not Israel's first vaccine drive

From mandatory inoculations to threats of criminal proceedings against anti-vaccinators, the country has had to battle numerous potential medical catastrophes, such as smallpox, typhoid and polio outbreaks
Amit Naor, the National Library of Israel|
The rampant spread of the coronavirus and the proven effectiveness of the vaccines have given rise to a serious controversy: Is it morally acceptable or even legal for the state to impose mandatory vaccination on its citizens?
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

  • As it turns out, the Public Health Ordinance, a regulation enacted during the British Mandate and still in effect today, includes a clause allowing the government to force the population to be vaccinated if the illness in question presents a serious danger to the public.
    6 View gallery
    כרזות חיסונים
    כרזות חיסונים
    An image used in one of Israel's earliest vaccination campaigns
    (Photo: Edgar Hirshbein)
    "In any city, village or area in which an infectious disease has taken or is likely to take epidemic form... the Director or Government Physician may take measures they deem as necessary to protect the residents of these places," the regulation reads.
    This clause has actually been activated several times during Israel's history: Once in 1949 following an outbreak of smallpox, again in the early 1990s after a measles outbreak in the south, and most recently in 2018, due to a local measles outbreak in the north.
    In 1952, typhoid fever spread in Israel and an extensive vaccination campaign was launched. Not unlike the recent spread of the coronavirus, the government deliberated whether to activate the mandatory vaccine clause.
    6 View gallery
    כרזות חיסונים
    כרזות חיסונים
    A 1949 notice about the need to vaccinate against smallpox
    (Photo: National Library of Israel)
    A poster from then-director general of the Health Ministry, Chaim Sheba, even threatened criminal proceedings against those who refused to be vaccinated.
    6 View gallery
    כרזות חיסונים
    כרזות חיסונים
    A 1952 advert signed by then-Health Ministry chief Chaim Sheba warning of criminal action against those refusing a typhus vaccine
    (Photo: National Library of Israel)
    Eventually however, and apparently due to the opposition of several district physicians, the government decided to drop its draconic approach and continue the vaccination campaign as was.
    6 View gallery
    כרזות חיסונים
    כרזות חיסונים
    A poster reading: Beware of scrub typhus, demand your jab from your doctor
    (Photo: National Library of Israel)
    Many other vaccination campaigns throughout the country’s history have proven successful thanks in part to intensive public relations drives such as articles and posters urging the public to get vaccinated.
    6 View gallery
    כרזות חיסונים
    כרזות חיסונים
    A 1957 poster encouraging immunization against polio
    (Photo: National Library of Israel)
    Still, some vaccination drives have been more heavy-handed than others, as seen in a poster from 1930, which included the names of parents whose children have not yet been vaccinated against smallpox alongside a warning that the Health Ministry would initiate proceedings against those refusing the inoculation.
    6 View gallery
    כרזות חיסונים
    כרזות חיסונים
    An 1030 poster calling for sanctions against parents who did not vaccinate their children against smallpox
    (Photo: National Library of Israel)
    As it turns out, mandatory vaccinations were also used by regimes predating even the British Mandate, such as the Ottomans who demanded that all their subjects be vaccinated against smallpox.
    And while it is unclear whether this provision was also valid for the residents of Israel who were under Turkish rule at the time, there is no question that in times of crisis, compulsory inoculations were utilized to avert any widespread catastrophe.
    Comments
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    ""