Companies are spending billions on AI but missing the real productivity bottleneck

As companies pour billions into AI and cut jobs, many are failing to see expected returns; experts say the real obstacle is outdated workflows and bureaucracy, arguing businesses must automate entire processes, not just individual tasks, to unlock AI’s potential

|
Microsoft’s recent announcement of cutting roughly 4,800 jobs is just the latest move in a massive wave of tech-sector layoffs. Companies are cutting heads to free up budget for artificial intelligence, yet corporate leaders are increasingly realizing that these investments are failing to deliver the expected Return on investment (ROI).

The experimentation trap

Many companies mistakenly treated AI as an off-the-shelf product—something you simply purchase and install. They failed to understand that implementing this technology requires a fundamental redesign of operational workflows. A McKinsey study found that while 88% of organizations already integrate AI into at least one business function, two-thirds (66%) admit they are stuck in the localized experimentation and pilot phase. As a result, only 39% report any financial impact at the corporate level, and a negligible minority of just 6% qualify as high performers who actually see a real return.
AI
AI
Recent studies show that employees waste an average of 3.5 hours per week just on expense reports, tracking receipts, and internal financial bureaucracy
(Illustration: ChatGPT)
Corporate operations consist of three distinct layers. First is the direct work on the product itself. Second is the supporting technological infrastructure, such as cloud systems and large language models designed to accelerate development. But there is a third, transparent layer that receives zero organizational attention: the old habits, cumbersome mechanisms, and endless red tape that drag the company down from within. Executives rush to upgrade products and infrastructure, claiming they just need another AI agent to build a presentation, while simultaneously accepting outdated operational and financial processes as "just the way things are."

The productivity paradox

A developer might write code in half the time using AI, yet the overall development cycle remains stalled for weeks due to manual code reviews and security clearances. A sales rep can generate a complex quote in minutes, but closing the deal takes months because of archaic procurement processes.
The most extreme gap lies within finance and operations. Recent studies show that employees at global organizations waste an average of 3.5 hours per week just on expense reports, tracking receipts, and internal financial bureaucracy. Employees face a frustrating gap between their professional autonomy and the financial system’s lack of trust. While technology allows them to make fast professional decisions and purchase digital tools in seconds, the reality on the ground turns them into paper-pushers. Employees end up paying out of pocket for routine expenses, petty cash, or business travel, resulting in an exhausting chase after receipts, redundant managerial approvals, and manual accounting reconciliations.
בינה מלאכותית AI
בינה מלאכותית AI
A developer might write code in half the time using AI, yet the overall development cycle remains stalled for weeks
(Photo: Shutterstock)
The outcome is wasted productive hours, frustrated employees, and a drop in the technology’s economic impact. Any organization that wants to see a real return on its AI investments must address efficiency and implement innovative, automated solutions within this transparent layer, seeking advanced tools for all workflows surrounding the employee.
If employees save valuable hours thanks to AI, only to waste them waiting for simple approvals and managing manual bureaucracy, the organization erases its competitive
advantage. The productivity paradox is stark: technology has accelerated individual efficiency, but the organizational structure has lagged behind.

Streamlining the bureaucracy

To resolve this bottleneck, companies must shift from automating individual tasks to automating entire end-to-end processes. The solution is not purchasing more AI tools, but building an autonomous operation that integrates legal, financial, and operational systems.
AI advocates will argue these are temporary growing pains, and that next-generation language models will solve management and approval bottlenecks. They are wrong. No AI model can resolve departmental turf wars, sign legal contracts, or alter a corporate culture rooted in redundant approval chains.
In the AI era, the winning companies will not be those with the fastest technology, but those with the shortest bureaucracy. Any CEO who continues to measure individual employee efficiency instead of overall process speed will quickly find that competitors have bypassed them—simply because those competitors knew how to make their organization lean, agile, and truly autonomous.
  • The author is the CEO of Robin Pay.
Comments
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
""