The French government's effort to set limits on minors' presence in the digital world has suffered a significant legal setback in Paris.
France's Constitutional Council — roughly equivalent to Israel's Supreme Court — struck down proposed legislation that sought to impose a blanket ban on social media use by children under 15.
Free speech violation or protection for children?
The legislation, which won broad bipartisan support in both the National Assembly and Senate and was personally championed by President Emmanuel Macron, was blocked on the grounds that it disproportionately infringed on constitutionally protected freedoms of expression and communication.
The French initiative was intended to take effect ahead of the school year and also included a blanket ban on smartphone use in schools, with exemptions for databases, educational tools and open-source platforms such as Wikipedia and GitHub.
Macron framed the measure as necessary to protect the mental health of younger generations from the addictive algorithms of U.S. and Chinese tech giants. Following the ruling, the French government plans to draft a revised version by next spring in an effort to overcome the constitutional obstacles and make the initiative one of Macron's signature achievements before the end of his term.
The legal clash in France is part of a broader global wave of tougher regulation, but it also highlights the deep gap between political declarations and what is technologically feasible while still protecting civil rights. Britain, Norway, Spain and Greece are advancing similar plans to impose age restrictions on social media, while Australia's experience illustrates how difficult such measures are to enforce in practice.
Australia enacted strict age restrictions, but recent data indicate that about 85% of teenagers who had active accounts continued to access them without interruption, either by using VPN services or because platforms lacked effective filtering and monitoring mechanisms.
Social media
(Photo: Getty Images)
What is happening around the world?
Differences in regulatory approaches around the world highlight competing models for overseeing technology. In the United States, efforts by various states to impose age restrictions and parental-consent requirements have repeatedly run into First Amendment protections for free speech, alongside longstanding laws designed to protect children's privacy online.
In Israel, the focus has been primarily on public awareness, enforcement through national protection centers and parliamentary debate over online bullying, without sweeping blocking measures. China, by contrast, employs an extreme model in which the state requires full real-name identification, while operating systems and apps impose a "minor mode" that automatically and tightly controls screen time and content.
At the heart of the issue is a complex technological and privacy challenge: reliably verifying a user's age without compromising privacy. Existing technological solutions, such as facial scanning and AI-based age estimation, have significant error rates among adolescents in transitional age groups.
Requiring users to upload official government identification, meanwhile, creates sensitive databases that could be exposed to security breaches and large-scale data leaks. Until decentralized encryption-based solutions are developed that can verify age-related attributes without revealing a user's full identity, the battle between regulators and technology giants is likely to continue in the courts.